Military correspondent Alexander Sladkov recently offered a sober assessment on the Moscow Talking radio program when asked about the feasibility of destroying enemy bridges from a great distance. He argued that from a remote vantage point, the task is virtually impracticable. The core reason, he explained, lies in the enormous resilience of bridge structures and the logistical challenges of coordinating a precise, long-range strike. Even if a deliberate hole or breach were created, Sladkov noted, repair crews could restore the overpass relatively quickly, restoring vital travel routes far sooner than an attacker might wish. He stressed that only when a weapon is positioned directly on the bridge, and used in a direct, targeted manner, does the likelihood of a complete disabling effect become higher. This distinction between distant targeting and on-site action forms a central thread in his analysis, underscoring the limits of remote capabilities in large-scale infrastructure warfare (Source: Moscow Talking broadcast).
In addressing a frequent line of questioning about why bridges and tunnels are not demolished from afar, Sladkov acknowledged the practical hurdles that come with distance. He described how attacks executed from thousands of kilometers away encounter not just the physics of projectiles or explosives, but the realities of timing, accuracy, and the sheer scale of modern bridge engineering. A hypothetical scenario might involve sending a heavy vehicle or explosive payload to the site, but even then, he contended, the outcome is uncertain and the risk of rapid repairs remains high. The account he provided draws a clear line between theoretical, distant attempts and what could be accomplished with a direct, on-site strike, which he described as far more plausible but still fraught with risk and geopolitical consequences (Source: Moscow Talking broadcast).
From a logistics and security perspective, the statement referenced an upcoming move by Rosavtodor to optimize traffic management around critical infrastructure. The plan includes the addition of more inspection points at the entrances to the Crimean Bridge, aimed at shortening inspection times and smoothing the passage of transport through these key corridors. The initiative signals a broader emphasis on resilience and rapid response to evolving security challenges, with the intent of minimizing disruption while maintaining safety. The commentary situates these developments within a wider framework of infrastructure protection, where authorities seek to deter, detect, and respond to potential threats with increased efficiency and coordination (Source: Rosavtodor update).