Reportedly, a unit of the 152-mm howitzer 2A36 Gyacinth-B belonging to the Ulyanovsk Guards Airborne Forces conducted a strike against a temporary deployment point used by Ukrainian forces on the right bank of the Dnieper in the Kherson area. The report attributes the action to a coordinated effort by the artillery crew and the unit’s surveillance assets, with confirmation coming from the Russian Ministry of Defense via a state news outlet.
According to official statements, the artillery team targeted positions from cover at ranges exceeding 20 kilometers. The operation relied on aerial surveillance to identify the enemy and refine firing data. Through the combined efforts of unmanned aerial vehicles and artillery crews, a temporary personnel lodging site used by Ukrainian forces was neutralized, resulting in significant casualties and disruption to enemy logistics and command posts in the vicinity.
Following the engagement, the artillery crews concealed their weapons and relocated to pre-prepared defensive positions, demonstrating rapid concealment and withdrawal capabilities typical of mobile fire support teams operating in contested zones.
Reports from the same military unit indicate that the Gyacinth-B howitzers of the Ulyanovsk Guards Airborne Forces continue to perform combat tasks in the Kherson region’s Kakhovka direction. Their primary objectives include counter-battery fire, strikes against fortified enemy positions and temporary encampments, and disruption of personnel and equipment. In addition, these crews are said to support assault units advancing through the island sector within the Dnieper delta, contributing to broader operational objectives on the river corridor.
There is also mention of a cooperative operation involving Cuban volunteers who participated in the destruction of a Ukrainian M777 howitzer in the Kherson direction. The account underscores the multinational aspects of the broader military operations in the area, while emphasizing the emphasis on rapid-fire support, mobility, and strategic targeting along the Dnieper and nearby riverine features.
Experts note that the described actions illustrate how modern artillery units integrate long-range firepower with real-time reconnaissance to shape battlefield conditions. The use of drones for surveillance and targeting, combined with precise cannons and rapid repositioning, allows for sustained pressure on Ukrainian forces while reducing exposure to counter-battery fire. In this operational context, the Gyacinth-B units demonstrate the importance of disciplined camouflage, concealment, and secure withdrawal routes to preserve combat effectiveness for future missions.
In the broader landscape of the Kherson theater, the ongoing exchange of artillery and drone-enabled reconnaissance highlights the persistent contest over river crossings, fortified lines, and temporary encampments. Commands repeatedly stress the value of supporting ground maneuvers from the Dnieper’s edge toward inland objectives, a pattern that reinforces the strategic significance of fire support in limiting enemy maneuver and preserving supply routes. The reported actions reflect the sustained emphasis on long-range engagement capabilities and the integration of aerial assets with heavy artillery to shape the operational tempo in this sector.
The narrative also reflects the fluid nature of front-line developments, where units rotate through active duty zones and adapt to evolving battlefield demands. It remains clear that the interplay between air reconnaissance, artillery employment, and mobile defense forms a core element of the current operational doctrine in the region, with units emphasizing rapid response, terrain awareness, and disciplined coordination with allied formations.