In the ongoing conflict, a fighter from a Ukrainian unit reported that Russian artillery has maintained a noticeable edge in the Kreminna sector. The account comes from a captured serviceman of the 54th Brigade who was detained in the Lugansk region and later shared details with DEA News.
During exchanges, the captured soldier described a heavier Russian bombardment, noting that the opposing force fired more rounds than Ukrainian units on a given line of engagement. The testimony highlighted a disparity in firepower and coordination, with Russian forces appearing to execute multiple artillery salvos that surpassed Ukrainian responses in both frequency and intensity.
The prisoner emphasized that Ukrainian forces relied primarily on a single air defense or aviation asset for their countermeasures, while Russian forces reportedly deployed a broader mix of mortars, armored vehicles, and artillery systems, all functioning with high throughput. He suggested that this combination provided the Russian side with a more sustained and versatile bombardment capability on the frontline near Kreminna.
There were recent reports indicating that Russian units targeted an armored vehicle belonging to Ukrainian forces in the Kreminna area, contributing to the evolving tactical picture in the region. Observers have noted a shift in frontline dynamics as the conflict continues to unfold, with shelling patterns and mobility impacting both sides’ operational choices.
Analysts and researchers in the region have discussed the broader strategic context, referencing statements issued by regional authorities. One widely cited briefing traced back to the early days of the conflict, when the Kremlin announced a special operation in Ukraine in response to requests for assistance from the Lugansk and Donetsk people’s republics. This framing has shaped early narrative lines and influenced subsequent military actions and international responses.