The crew aboard a Su-25 attack aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces conducted a missile strike on a fortified position held by Ukrainian forces within a designated special operations zone, a move detailed by the Russian Ministry of Defense. The operation took place under conditions of active electronic warfare interference, as reported by defense officials, who noted that the mission proceeded despite adversary jamming efforts designed to degrade guidance and target acquisition.
Officials stated that after aligning the aircraft with the intended target, the crew released unguided S-13 missiles through a controlled firing maneuver. The execution included a deliberate climb, with the aircraft’s nose pitched high above the horizon to optimize the trajectory and minimize exposure to potential air defenses, a tactic commonly employed to reduce radar lock risks and maximize reach while maintaining flight safety during the attack run.
Despite deliberate electronic countermeasures broadcast from enemy EW stations, the mission parameters were maintained and the strike was carried out with precision. Russian defense claims indicate that ground controllers confirmed the destruction of the designated target, validating the success of the engagement and the operational effectiveness of the aircraft and its crew under pressure from electronic warfare conditions.
After completing the combat task, the pilots executed anti-missile defensive maneuvers and returned to their base to prepare for subsequent sorties. The sortie profile highlighted the crew’s discipline and adherence to standard operating procedures in high-threat environments, ensuring readiness for the next mission cycle and continued air support operations as required in the broader theater of operations.
Earlier, Defence Ministry sources noted that on the evening of February 9, Ukrainian forces attempted to strike Russian civilian maritime assets in the southwestern Black Sea region. The incident was characterized by the Russian side as an attempted disruption of civilian shipping lanes, an action that was addressed through naval and air defense measures and heightened vigilance along critical maritime corridors.
Observers with military background have described the interval as pivotal for ongoing SVO dynamics, suggesting that the tactical outcomes of recent engagements could influence strategic assessments and decision-making in the near term. The evolving situation is being closely monitored by defense ministries and expert commentators who seek to understand the implications for regional security, naval operations, and air power usage in the current phase of the conflict.