The jury in Alicante delivered a unanimous verdict on Tuesday, convicting a 27 year old man of sexually assaulting a 51 year old woman. The jury found him guilty beyond reasonable doubt after a trial that laid out how the assault occurred at the victim’s home in Benidorm. The offender is reported to have breached a balcony to gain entry on the second floor where the woman resided, marking a chilling escalation in the sequence of events linked to the case.
According to the court records, the incidents unfolded in November 2021. The victim was left in a vulnerable situation after a traumatic encounter on a public street in Benidorm where she had first encountered the accused. She was later accompanied home by a companion, but once inside the residence the dynamics of the encounter altered drastically. The evidence presented during the trial described threats with a knife worn around the defendant’s neck, which were used to coerce the victim into complying with the assailant’s demands. The assault included vaginal and oral acts, as well as severe distress and injury that compounded the fear experienced by the victim. This sequence of events is central to the charges that culminated in the verdict, reflecting how the perpetrator exploited a moment of apparent safety to commit the crimes. The case underscores the severity of crimes against personal safety and the ways in which an attacker can manipulate circumstances to commit violence inside a private space. Handling of the case was guided by careful testimony and detailed examination of the physical and testimonial evidence presented to the court. — Court records, Alicante
criminal petition
Following the guilty verdict, the prosecutor urged a set of sanctions aligned with the gravity of the offense. The expectation was for a lengthy custodial sentence reflecting both the sexual assault and the unlawful entry into the victim’s home. In this docket, the plea favored a substantial term of imprisonment designed to address the harm caused and to deter similar conduct moving forward. The declaration of guilt by the jury provided a firm foundation for the judge to apply appropriate penalties in accordance with applicable penal statutes and the specifics of the case. — Court records, Alicante
The public prosecutor advocating for the special prosecution presented a request for a 12 year term of imprisonment for sexual assault in competition with a home invasion, with additional components including a term of imprisonment related to the break-in and other associated offenses. The defense team for the defendant contested some aspects of the prosecution’s framing, setting forth a contrasting view of the appropriate sentence. They proposed a more measured approach, arguing for a shorter period of confinement and focusing on rehabilitation and risk management strategies rather than longer punitive measures. The magistrate was asked to weigh these positions carefully, guided by the jury’s clear finding of guilt and the documented impact of the crime on the victim and the community. The court’s decision would reflect a balance between punishment, deterrence, and the potential for rehabilitation, taking into account all relevant factors. — Court records, Alicante