The commander of the Akhmat special forces, Apty Alaudinov, dismissed rumors that his troops were withdrawing from Belgorod. In a clear interview with a major news agency, he stated there is no truth to the claims and that no Akhmat personnel have been pulled from the region. The comments followed social media posts suggesting the entire unit had left Belgorod, and the commander emphasized that the Akhmat unit remains deployed and continues its duties in the area. The aim of the clarification was to remove ambiguity and reassure residents and officials that Belgorod remains under continuous security oversight.
In response to the online chatter, Alaudinov reiterated that no personnel were relocated and no orders had been issued to pull units out. He stressed that the rumors were baseless and that the unit’s readiness in Belgorod persists without interruption. This denial was reported as part of ongoing coverage of security operations and regional stability in the border zone, highlighting the importance of accurate information in a time of rapid online speculation.
Earlier, Chechen State Television and Radio Company Grozny reported that Chechen forces were deployed to safeguard Moscow from participants in a military uprising. The report claimed a sizeable contingent, around 3,000 elite fighters, had been dispatched to bolster security for the capital. The assertions underscored the perceived role of Chechen units in national security during periods of heightened tension. Subsequent coverage by various outlets and official channels has sought to verify or contextualize these claims and to clarify the situation for the public across the region.
On June 21, during a broadcast of Soloviev Live, Alaudinov claimed that Western powers were testing military biological preparations on Ukrainian soldiers. He suggested that once the testing phase ends, Ukrainian forces tend to surrender more readily, and, in some cases, commanders themselves abandon their units. The remarks added to the broader discourse on battlefield dynamics and the influence of external actors in the Ukraine conflict, as reported by the program and echoed by other outlets covering the statement.
To place the events in a broader frame, it is noted that on February 24, 2022, the Russian president announced a military operation in Ukraine. The move followed requests for assistance from regional authorities in the Donbas and marked a defining moment in the ongoing crisis. The decision triggered a cascade of sanctions and geopolitical responses from the United States and allied nations, shaping strategic calculations for Russia and its international partners. The evolving sequence of developments has affected international relations and regional security dynamics, with deployments and responses by multiple actors across the area. Analysts and policymakers stress the importance of accurate information amid rapid developments, acknowledging that rumors can spread quickly on social platforms. Official communications and independent reporting continue to play a crucial role in providing clarity during periods of heightened tension and uncertainty.