Alicante Provincial Court sentenced two men accused of embezzling more than 1.4 million euros from a courier company to a total of two years in prison. Given sentence applied to the High Criminal Courtdeclared the defendants as perpetrators of two crimes: embezzlement and falsification of documents. In addition to the prison sentence, the defendant must also pay compensation Tourline Express Courier with 1,443,013 Euros plus corresponding interest.
According to the facts proven in the sentence imposed by the Second Circuit, the fraud was committed between 2012 and 2015. One of the defendants was in charge of two branches of Tourline Express Courier. Alicante and San Vicente del Raspeig and a defendant worked in the collections management department of the same company in Barcelona.
The company was dedicated to express courier services and made shipments to customers. cash on delivery and the abuse was done with this money. The couriers collected the amount in cash and the money had to be deposited into Tourline Express Messaging’s bank account so that the company could immediately refund the said amount to the customer who arranged the shipment, as stated in the decision.
For this, the company has a computer program Where revenue is recorded to be sent to customers who make shipments.
Dealerships
However, the sentence does not apply to the defendant, who owns two franchises in Alicante and San Vicente. money not being deposited into the company’s accounts, but he included it in his inheritance.
He cooperated with defendants working in the prison to avoid discovery. collection management department and, as explained in the court decision, fictitious income was reflected in the Tourline Express computer system.
The deceived business saw that unreal income appeared in its computer system, and then began to make money transfers to its customers that, although registered, did not correspond to material reality.
The court adds that thanks to this fraud, the company suffered obvious losses. Economic damage “While paying for something that was not previously deposited into their bank accounts, even though it was officially recorded as having been carried out by the two defendants.”
In its decision, the court states that the two defendants recorded more income in the control computer program than they actually earned. The court points out that the person responsible for the two delegations consisting of Alicante and San Vicente acted in connivance with the employee of the company in Barcelona.
The defendant exercised his right not to testify at the hearing, and the defendant denied the facts.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.