The judge in the Pergola case agreed to ask the City Council to have another city lawyer issue a report on the stock offer if they felt they were harmed by the alleged splitting of contracts across multiple jobs. In La Alcoraya. Necessity Judge María Luisa Carrascosa This follows a document submitted by anti-corruption prosecutors requesting a report from the head of the Consortium’s legal services. Rafael Ramos, This case, in which he said he would not come to the City Council hearing because he was not harmed, was handled by another attorney because he had to abstain from having originally defended the case. exedil José Ramón González, One of those being investigated for administrative evasion.
The president of the Instruction Court No. 9 of Alicante says: To the City Council within five days other lawyers thus take responsibility for the article and include reasons supporting the Board’s opinion. The judge’s decision dated October 5 is not final and can be appealed to the court within three days.
appeal to court
On the other hand, the judge issued another order in which he predictably rejected the reform objections presented by the defense of former councilman José Ramón González and the heads of services of the regions (Village Directorates) who led the investigation of the two former councillors. and Infrastructure). Exedil Manuel Jimenez He applied directly to the court.
The court continues its investigation and therefore the Alicante Regional Court will resolve the objection of the investigated lawyers.
The judge points out that the people who are the subject of the investigation can no longer claim that they did not exist at the time of this procedure. sufficient evidence against him to proceed with the procedure. The judge reiterates the existence of rational evidence of a crime on the part of the appellants and points out that at this procedural moment there is no room for “a comprehensive and exhaustive analysis of the evidentiary material that characterizes the oral proceedings.” In the indictment, the judge stated that there were indications that “the relevant procedure regarding the amount was neglected in signing the contracts, the amounts were divided into various actions and the small contract was adjusted according to the amount limit.”
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.