A Neighbor of San Vicente del Raspeig I recorded a sex tape of me having sex with another woman and days later He showed it to two of his friends on the way to the party. The woman admitted that the video was recorded but not shown to third parties. She is now sentenced to ten months in prison for a crime she. crime against privacyAccording to the sentence that was made public this Thursday.
Third part of the article Alicante County Court confirmed the sentence ten months in prison A man was sentenced to prison by the Criminal Court for a crime against privacy for showing two of his friends a video of him having sex with another woman.
Therefore, the Provincial Court also dismissed the detainee’s appeal against the decision of the first-instance court, which also imposes the following obligation on him: 700 euro compensation to the victim for the damages.
The decision is deemed proven to have occurred 13 November 2020, In the case of a 26-year-old defendant having sexual intercourse with the consent of a woman recorded with his consent Inside your home in the town of San Vicente del Raspeig.
A few days later, the man showed the footage to a friend he was partying with, this time without the victim’s permission. HE my friend had to play the video partially and this was accepted orally to the injured party. The accused is also then showed the same recording to another friend.
Spectator It has now delivered an appeal decision upholding the decision made months ago by a criminal court in Alicanterealizing that the latter involves a “reasonable and rational” assessment of the evidence applied at the trial, such as the testimonies of witnesses.
witnesses
The defendant appealed the first sentence given by the court. Alicante two criminal courts the two main witnesses, namely the women to whom the intimate images were shown, They did not accept at trial. They had seen the video. The Court reiterates that the sentence makes an assessment of the evidence as a whole, with the different appearances of the witnesses. they were less strong in their affirmation. The verdict recalls that during the interrogations both of them admitted to having seen the video and that at least one of them recognized the complainant as the person appearing in the video.
The verdict recalls that the victim declared that one of the witnesses had admitted to watching the video the night the defendant showed it to him. Later in other statements I tried to qualify He said that he did not remember the incident very well because he was affected by the consumption of alcoholic beverages. The Court recalls in these appearances: Witness statements were persuasive.. Therefore, the magistrate’s assessment of all the evidence is considered correct. The sentence states, “The appellant highlights and questions all elements that may raise suspicion, but does not consider the evidence as a whole”.
In its decision, the court emphasizes that even if the accused did not commit an act: “public distribution” disclosure of confidential images to third parties without the consent of the complainant, thus seriously harming personal privacy“Therefore, the facts constitute a crime under Article 197.7 of the Criminal Code.
The decision is not final and contrary to it extraordinary appeal.
Source: Informacion
James Sean is a writer for “Social Bites”. He covers a wide range of topics, bringing the latest news and developments to his readers. With a keen sense of what’s important and a passion for writing, James delivers unique and insightful articles that keep his readers informed and engaged.