According to the CPI, unions want a 3.5 percent minimum wage increase and revision clauses in 2022.

So they continue salary review articles this was one of the main obstacles to reaching an agreement in AENC’s negotiation with employers. What this clause does is that if the salary increase this year is 3.5% and inflation ends at 4%, on January 1, 2023, the company pays the difference this year and then gives a 0.5 percentage point salary increase. “We want show a clear message business entities: this is serious. We will not allow a price crisis not created by workers to be paid by workers out of their wages. Therefore, these Content that cannot be resolved in AENC They will be transferred to all negotiating tables,” he warned. deaf at the end of the meeting.

The unions argue that the minimum increases they advocate are “reasonable” compared to this month’s CPI (8.4%). By April, wages agreed between employers and unions had increased by an average of 2.4%, up just a few percent from a month ago. To get an idea, the suggested increase (3.5%) for this year will be very similar to the previous year. Minimum Interprofessional Salary (SMI) rose 3.6%. This predictions inflation In 2022, the rate of change, according to the Bank of Spain, will continue to rise, with an average of 4% and 7.5% as of December. The inflation forecast for 2023 and 2024 is between 2% and 3%.

“Companies have increased prices at least as much as the material they work for, and this is where the rise in CPI comes from, and as a result we workers have to raise wages in the same direction,” he warned. Pepe Alvarez. Plants, if not, warned. change of action by employers, unions “will be promoted before summer demonstrations in industries and companies”, leaving the ball on the companies’ court. “The mobilizations, employer position In the collective bargaining, we, the trade unions, take an extraordinarily moderate stance in this negotiation,” he argued. Pepe Alvarez Sordo, “about July it will be mobilization milestones“.

On the other hand, the two leaders attacked the UN’s recommendation. CEOE and Cepyme employers and businessmen prefer “to collect” Aground if deals are negotiated. It is the possibility of delivery. non-implementation of agreements by companies after determining a consultation period with workers when “economic, technical, organizational or production reasons” agree. Both unionsirresponsibility“The recommendation of employers to use a mechanism that should be used according to them, reasons for force majeure. “For major evils such as the dismissal or disappearance of a company, temporary adaptation of a contract is recommended, but no open bar turntable,” said Sordo.

“I don’t know if he’s the CEO aware of playing with fire because collective bargaining agreements are brought to the agenda in a generalized manner in cases where they are limited by the legislation. very specific reasons I think it reinvigorates the trade union approach that legislation needs to be changed in our country,” Álvarez commented. The option to leave the hook was introduced in the 2012 labor reform. People’s Party. “Recruitment of bosses has to comply not meeting the general criteria in collective bargaining objective situations It can happen at a particular time in a particular company,” he added.