A tech creator unveiled what is claimed to be the world’s first iPhone 16 Pro with a transparent back cover. The claim has sparked discussion among enthusiasts and skeptics alike, inviting curiosity about what such a design would look like in daily use and how it would hold up under real world conditions. The concept is striking because it turns the usual design logic on its head, making the inner components the centerpiece rather than tucked away behind glass, and it invites a broader conversation about materials, durability, and aesthetics in premium devices.
To achieve transparency the back was heated to soften the glass, the outer layer carefully removed, and the internal aluminum coating stripped away with a chemical bath. The MagSafe magnets were detached from the back panel, and the glass was treated to reveal a matte, rough texture on the surface. The result is a panel that appears fully see‑through while still bearing the marks and textures of its internal structure. The process highlights how surface treatment and selective material removal can alter the look without necessarily compromising the underlying frame or core components.
In the final stage the panel was reattached and the cameras protective lenses were replaced. However the rings around the camera modules and the side frame could not be made transparent because these parts are constructed from titanium and aluminum, materials that resist full optical transparency. Despite these limits, the device is reported to retain its core functionality, with the cameras, flash, wireless charging and MagSafe magnets continuing to operate as expected. The combination of visible internals and preserved performance is what draws attention to both the feasibility and the constraints of such a modification.
Observers note that while the visual effect is compelling, such modifications raise questions about durability, waterproofing, warranty coverage, and safety. The back panel must withstand daily handling, impacts, and thermal stress, and any breach could affect sealing against dust or moisture. The project nonetheless demonstrates a willingness to experiment with hardware aesthetics and may push designers to rethink how much of a device should remain private and how much can become a bold form of self-expression without sacrificing reliability.
The idea appears to have caught attention beyond a single prototype, with hobbyists in various regions exploring transparent covers or frames to personalize smartphones. It is also worth noting that transparent phone accessories gained notable attention on large marketplaces, reflecting consumer interest in bold, visible hardware. Despite the fascination, broad adoption remains unlikely in the near term due to warranty implications, practical durability concerns, and the technical hurdles involved in keeping optics and wireless features fully functional.