Security, like most things in the digital age, never comes with a full guarantee. A recent discussion with RIAMO feature cyber expert Sergei Vakulin explored a startling claim: the FSB reportedly uncovered a U.S. intelligence operation that used malware to infiltrate Apple smartphones used by ordinary Russians and by diplomats. The interview stressed that this discovery does not justify giving up on the device. The message was clear: even in a landscape where fresh threats emerge, abandoning a widely used platform is not a straightforward solution. The broader takeaway is that safeguarding personal devices is about layered defenses, regular updates, and mindful usage rather than a reactionary ban. (attribution: RIAMO)
Vakulin underscored a fundamental reality of modern cybersecurity: there are always known and unknown viruses, bugs, and vulnerabilities. His analogy drew a stark image: if a virus appears in a single product, it does not mean the product should be discarded outright. Just as people accept that accidents may happen on the road or that meteorites may strike, digital ecosystems carry inherent risk. The prudent approach, he suggested, is to stay informed, patch promptly, and adopt best practices for digital hygiene. He also pointed out that declaring a ban on domestic devices is unlikely to yield immediate market changes; developers and manufacturers continue to adapt, and new devices may enter the market as technology evolves. (attribution: RIAMO)
On the regulatory and strategic front, the FSB reported that malware infected several thousand iPhones used by both Russian and international users. This situation has fueled speculation about collaboration between Apple and American intelligence. The industry response emphasizes that device security is a shared responsibility across manufacturers, software developers, and users. Keeping devices up to date, enabling security features, and remaining cautious about unfamiliar apps and links are practical steps that can reduce risk. The episode also highlights the complexity of attributing cyber intrusions and the importance of evidence-based analysis before drawing broad conclusions about corporate or governmental collaboration. (attribution: RIAMO)