The Ministry of Digital Development of the Russian Federation has prepared a draft government decree that would require mobile operators to transfer subscriber data to Roskomnadzor. This initiative was reported by the Federal portal of projects on normative legal acts and reflects a move to centralize oversight over telecommunications services.
According to the draft, the transfer would include personal identifiers of subscribers and users of communication services, specifically surnames, given names, and patronymics. The document also mentions information about the dates of conclusion and termination of contracts with subscribers, outlining the timeline and nature of ongoing service relationships.
In addition, the draft proposes that operators provide Roskomnadzor with a list of subscriber numbers that are allocated to commercial entities and individual entrepreneurs who have signed agreements for the provision of communications services. The intention is to create a consolidated register that covers a broad spectrum of users within the market.
Earlier statements from notable policymakers indicated that there will be discussions on updates to the personal data liability framework. Alexander Khinshtein, who chairs a committee on information policy and communications, signaled that upcoming versions of the draft documents would be examined to address potential criminal liability in cases of personal data leaks. The discussions were expected to occur in the following week and are part of ongoing efforts to tighten accountability around personal data handling.
This subject marks a shift in how data managed by telecom operators is treated in terms of oversight and responsibility. Observers note that the move, if enacted, would intensify the role of Roskomnadzor in monitoring and enforcing compliance with data protection requirements within the communications sector. Critics and supporters alike are assessing the potential impacts on customer privacy, business operations, and the broader regulatory environment for digital services in Russia.
The draft underscores a trend toward greater governmental transparency and control over data flows associated with telecommunications. Proponents argue that such measures could improve security, enable more effective responses to information risks, and support regulatory coordination across multiple agencies. Opponents, however, raise concerns about privacy protections and the practical implications for service providers who must manage complex data sharing obligations.
As the conversation evolves, stakeholders are closely watching how these proposals will influence compliance costs, data protection standards, and the rules governing how personal information is stored, processed, and accessed by state authorities. The outcome will likely shape the landscape for operators, users, and policymakers navigating the intersection of public safety, privacy rights, and economic activity in the digital era.