A TV presenter and journalist commented on the controversial gathering hosted by blogger Anastasia Ivleeva, sharing his perspective in a video released on his Telegram channel. The discussion centered on Ivleeva herself, with the speaker highlighting Niceness and intelligence as traits he associates with the influencer while addressing the surrounding drama that followed the event.
The journalist described Ivleeva as smart and kind, and he defended her amid the public discourse that erupted in the wake of the party. He pointed out that personal judgments and reputational fervor were taking center stage, sometimes obscuring the broader context of the night and the choices made by those who attended.
In reflecting on the party, the speaker noted that a group of individuals whom he once considered friendly appeared to drift away as the events surrounding Ivleeva unfolded. He suggested that the behavior of these attendees had been predictable for some time, emphasizing that the focus of the public discourse had shifted toward Ivleeva in a way that he felt exaggerated and unreasonable. According to the speaker, the heated response to the event did not align with his views on Ivleeva or the situation itself, and he urged a calmer, more measured examination of the circumstances.
The party took place at the Mutabor club on December 20, with a dress code that encouraged attendees to wear outfits that were bold and revealing. The guest list included high-profile figures such as Ksenia Sobchak, Olga Orlova, Philip Kirkorov, the group Glukoza, Lolita Milyavskaya, Oksana Samoilova, rapper Vacio, and Dzhigan. The public attention focused on the explicit nature of the party’s theme, which many perceived as provocative, and the ensuing discussion intensified the broader debate about the boundaries of social events hosted by online personalities. The subsequent public reaction is described by observers as part of a broader trend of online cancel culture, where prominent figures face expedited judgment based on a single event or theme.
Meanwhile, questions about responsibility and accountability were raised as part of ongoing conversations surrounding Ivleeva and her circle. The narrative surrounding the party prompted commentators, fans, and critics to analyze the limits of influence, the potential consequences for those involved, and the impact such gatherings may have on public perception. Throughout the coverage, the emphasis remained on Ivleeva and her capacity to respond to the developing conversations with clarity and consistency.
Earlier remarks by the same media figure touched on a warning he issued about rumors relating to his own health. In that context, he expressed a desire to address misinformation and protect his reputation, signaling that he would respond to false claims directly if needed. The conversation, overall, underscores how high-profile personalities navigate scrutiny, media narratives, and audience expectations in today’s digital landscape.