New information surrounding Operation Deluxe has been rebranded as Operation Luna. Ángel Jesús Fernández Hita, a police officer involved in the matter, has stepped into the public eye amid multiple espionage claims. He acknowledged sharing certain details with Gustavo González on various occasions, though he emphasizes that the information exchange occurred within a circle of trust and friendship. The disclosures, he asserts, were not tied to any formal action and were shared in a casual, personal context. According to statements given to El Confidencial, Hita does not shy away from admitting the exchange, noting that a request for favors prompted him to respond with data that could range from routine notes to more sensitive items. He adds that some of the information involved addresses and other identifying details about public figures, while stressing that his intent was never to harm but to assist in what he describes as personal oversight or verification efforts. The respondent insists that the broader aim was to help uncover irregularities or potential fraud, framing the information as a means to prevent misuse and deception. He points out that the accuracy of what was shared was tested by cross-checking against observable signs, and that the subsequent steps were taken by others who had the proper channels to review and verify the material. In his view, the exchange should not be construed as an act of manipulation, but rather as a side effect of friendships intersecting with investigative work. He maintains that his involvement was limited and that he did not participate in any wrongdoing, asserting that his role was to supply leads that others evaluated for credibility.
The discussion surrounding these disclosures, as reported, centers on a broader context of celebrity coverage and media involvement in ongoing espionage allegations. A key element in the narrative is the admission that information was shared with at least one colleague in the entertainment media environment, a setting where personal ties can blur the lines between friendship and professional duty. While the testimonies acknowledge that some instances involved informal sharing, the overall claim remains that no direct benefit was extracted and that the intention was to identify and disclose possible fraud. The dynamics of trust and obligation are described as the primary drivers behind what has been disclosed, rather than any stated motive for personal gain. The conversation also touches on how certain public figures are referenced in the process of verification, with the implication that names may appear in internal discussions or reports that were circulated within a small, interconnected network of individuals who knew one another through shared professional circles.
When Belén Esteban denounced Gustavo González’s espionage in ‘Sálvame’: “Do you think I am a criminal?”
The former agent clarifies that Gustavo González is the only person to whom he has offered information in a personal context, underscoring that the exchange stemmed from friendship rather than professional coercion. He notes that he is acquainted with the father of a prominent paparazzo, a connection that reportedly influenced the flow of information at times. According to various reports, Gustavo would have passed some of this information to the program on which he worked; however, Hita insists that he never sought to exploit the situation or profit from it. He mentions that offers of money did arise from some quarters, though he refrains from naming individuals and emphasizes that the informal nature of these interactions often dissolved without lasting consequence. The emphasis remains on the principle that personal relationships were the primary catalyst for the information sharing, not a calculated attempt to manipulate the media landscape.
Within the described web of names touched by these disclosures, several high-profile individuals are identified as affected. Bethlehem Esteban is mentioned for claiming during live broadcasts that a collaborator and their spouse were watching a particular location. Additional names referenced in the discussion include Isabel Pantoja, José Ortega Cano, his son José Fernando, and nephew Óscar Romero. Journalistic figures such as Gema Serrano are also cited, alongside media personalities connected to other well-known entertainment figures, including Kiko Matamoros and Di Stéfano. Other names that appear in the conversations include Kiko Rivera and Omar Montes, as well as public figures like Aída Nízar and Yvonne Reyes. The narrative aligns these mentions with claims of surveillance, verification efforts, and the broader scrutiny that accompanies tabloid-style reporting in high-profile celebrity circles. Attribution is provided from reported conversations and statements gathered through investigative channels and media coverage, recognizing the fluid nature of the information as it moves through different faces of the public discourse.