Meghan Markle has reflected on the events that have unfolded with the royal family, and as a result, she chose not to attend the coronation. This development is reported by Page Six, citing unnamed sources familiar with the discussions.
One insider described the decision as sincere and grounded in the complexity of recent years. The source noted that Harry and Meghan have consistently spoken about the importance of family, and their actions appear to align with those statements. The insider added that both spouses are prioritizing their relatives, with Meghan remaining in California while Harry offers support to his father.
According to discussions reportedly held over several weeks, the couple weighed Prince Harry’s coronation carefully. The decision, described as a family choice, reflects a moment where private considerations intersect with public duties. The same source emphasized that the couple made the choice together, with a shared sense of responsibility guiding their path forward.
In the reported plan, Meghan Markle would stay in California with their two children, while Prince Harry would attend the May 6 service at Westminster Abbey. The timing also coincides with their son Archie’s fourth birthday, adding another layer to the family’s careful scheduling of public appearances and private moments.
Historically, the British royal family has maintained a substantial collection of assets and cultural artifacts, including a widely discussed stamp collection valued at tens of millions of pounds. The size and significance of such collections often frame broader conversations about royal duties, heritage, and public interest, even as individual family members navigate personal life with greater transparency. This backdrop helps contextualize why personal decisions around public engagement can attract intense media scrutiny and widespread public curiosity. The broader public interest in royal events remains high, with fans and observers closely watching how family dynamics influence ceremonial commitments. The unfolding narrative continues to be covered by multiple outlets, with observers weighing the implications for ceremonial tradition and contemporary monarchy. In discussions about these choices, analysts highlight how the balance between private life and public roles can shape the tone of royal engagement in the weeks surrounding a coronation, particularly when a member of the couple has chosen a different path than the traditional expectation. Marked citations to relevant reports underscore that the decision was a joint one, reflecting a deliberate approach to family priorities and public obligations, as noted by sources familiar with the conversations. [Citation: Page Six]