Meghan Markle and Lizzy Candy: A Controversial Take on the Coronation and Family Choices
Public discussion has resurfaced about Meghan Markle and her former friend, British television presenter Lizzy Candy, with Candy labeling Meghan as “selfish” for reportedly declining attendance at Charles III’s coronation. The remarks appeared in a Daily Mirror piece that sparked renewed debate about royal traditions, media narratives, and the impact on Meghan’s children.
According to Candy, Meghan may skip the coronation because she anticipates backlash and rumors that she would be booed. The TV personality suggested Meghan would prioritize her own emotions and concerns over attending, especially given the public setting and scrutiny. Candy’s comments also centered on the royal siblings within Markle and Prince Harry’s family, noting that Lilibet and Archie would not be present at what many view as a historic national moment.
Questions have been raised about how Harry and Meghan might address their children in the future regarding this decision. Candy posited that if the children ask why they were not on the balcony or part of that historic moment in England, Meghan would need to explain while acknowledging the pressures of public life. The implication is that Meghan’s choice is shaped by anticipated crowd reactions and the broader media environment surrounding the royal family. The remarks included strong character judgments about Meghan’s priorities and her relationship with Harry, as described by Candy in her statements.
The timeline of their friendship goes back to 2013 when Meghan and Candy were seated together at a charity event. The dynamic shifted as Markle began dating Prince Harry, and the two gradually stopped maintaining contact. This evolution in their friendship illustrates how personal relationships can be influenced by romance, public duty, and the intense spotlight that accompanies life in the royal circle. The conversation also touches on broader themes of loyalty, public perception, and the private costs of high-profile associations.
In related commentary, some media reports have alleged that a portion of the royal family’s charitable jewelry donations and other philanthropic items have faced scrutiny and public speculation. Such discussions underscore the broader media ecosystem surrounding the monarchy, where narratives about values, heritage, and public service intersect with questions of personal choice and accountability. The focus remains on how families navigate public expectations while maintaining private identities amid ongoing scrutiny. These conversations are common in discussions about modern monarchy and its public-facing duties, particularly in Canada, the United States, and other Commonwealth nations where audiences closely follow royal affairs. (Daily Mirror)