In a public discussion about the incident involving actress Liana Griba and Elena Eremenko, the wife of Nikita Volkov, Griba asserted that she did not initiate the confrontation and that the injuries described in the official statement did not occur as claimed. She explained that her actions were defensive and that she prepared a response with her legal counsel before presenting it to law enforcement. Griba noted that the case was closed prior to the onset of winter. Later, she and her fiancé filed a marriage registration application on December 9.
Griba also stated that there was no special relationship with Volkov and that any such claims were a misunderstanding or a product of others’ imagination. She added that balancing personal life with public work can be challenging for actors, both on and off screen, and that romance in real life does not always mirror on-set partnerships.
Initial media reports from the Shot Telegram channel claimed that during a social gathering the actor allegedly expressed romantic feelings for his co-star’s spouse. The publication further alleged that a glass of wine was thrown at Eremenko and that a confrontation followed. Those reports prompted swift reaction and statements from those involved, prompting a broader discussion about how such rumors circulate in the entertainment industry.
Earlier remarks from Griba’s representatives addressed rumors asserting that she did not assault her co-star’s wife. The subsequent dialogue emphasized the importance of verifying facts before spreading sensational headlines and highlighted the role of official channels in clarifying incidents of this nature. The episode underscored the pressures faced by performers when personal lives become public fodder and illustrated how quickly misinformation can spread through multiple media platforms.
Observers note that disputes of this kind can be complicated by public perception and the dynamics of on-set collaborations. In this case, the parties involved have moved toward formalizing personal life events while verifying details through proper legal and civil procedures. The evolving situation demonstrates how actors navigate media scrutiny, personal relationships, and the demands of a high-profile career without compromising privacy or professional responsibilities. At the same time, it serves as a reminder of the careful balance required when interpreting heated moments at social gatherings, especially when differences in storytelling and public narratives arise across different outlets and social networks.