Jorge Javier Vázquez finds himself squarely in the spotlight after a pointed blog post last Wednesday that took aim at Alaska and what he described as Mario Vaquerizo. The message carried by the broadcaster was blunt and provocative, labeling the situation as a major disappointment and inviting readers to draw their own conclusions about the tensions at play. A few days later, the artist offered a response during the Dial Awards in Tenerife, a moment that brought reporters to the front row to press for clarification on the evolving exchange.
In remarks compiled for Europa Press, Alaska offered context for her stance, noting that her views on the matter diverge from Vázquez’s. She suggested that the person who writes and signs their name to a public platform should take responsibility for the ideas they share, and that a speaker cannot always speak for others. The sentiment was calm but pointed, underscoring a sense of boundaries between personal expression and public commentary.
The Alaskan performer also made clear that the host’s public words did not wound her for a single, simple reason: she did not feel personally depicted by the portrayal. It was as if the framing suggested a familiar persona—an archetype like Pilar Rubio—and she rejected that shorthand. She added that when someone writes about a topic, it represents their own view, and it is meant to reach the audience as crafted by that author, not as a universal truth. She acknowledged the possibility of reading back statements and realizing they carry a different weight upon later reflection, suggesting that timing and media cycles often shape interpretation more than the immediate moment.
Alaska then reflected on the nature of public entertainment and professional camaraderie. She stated that she still holds a deep respect for the presenter and did not imply a personal rift. The relationship, she explained, was never that of close friends, yet it had produced moments of value and shared experiences on the show. The present reality, she noted, does not erase those memories or the warmth of past interactions. Alaska expressed a straightforward readiness to acknowledge colleagues when paths cross, emphasizing a culture of courtesy that persists regardless of disagreement. She portrayed the Dial Awards as a space where dialogue can occur without erasing the history that exists between performers.
In closing, Alaska offered a pragmatic perspective on public discourse. If she were to encounter Jorge Javier in person, she would respond with a polite, professional greeting, a simple acknowledgment of shared work and the effort it takes to entertain audiences. She described herself as conscientious and well-m mannered, attributes she believes are reflected in how she conducts herself on television and in media appearances. The remark pointed to a broader belief that public figures can disagree without damaging the broader ecosystem that includes their fans, colleagues, and the media that cover them. Overall, the dialogue between Alaska and Vázquez highlighted how opinions can diverge within the realm of entertainment, while the underlying respect for professional contributions remains intact.