He’s not having a good time. The influencer shared a troubling experience on her social networks about an aesthetic clinic she visited to remove scars endured during her time in the country. The ordeal drew attention from fans and media alike, casting a spotlight on patient safety and aftercare in cosmetic procedures.
The account begins with shock and disbelief. She explained that after receiving treatment at the clinic, she suffered multiple burns on her legs and was immediately transported to a hospital. In the emergency department, doctors diagnosed second-degree burns that required urgent care and close monitoring. The incident underscored the emotional and physical toll that cosmetic procedures can take when things go wrong, and how quickly a routine visit can turn into a medical emergency.
She described the experience as painful and distressing, noting that she was treated in a manner that made the situation feel even more overwhelming. Cold therapy and rapid pain control were part of the initial response, but the pain persisted and the patient needed further evaluation at the ER. She also recalled the difficulty of movement due to the injuries, explaining that she could not even remove clothing well enough to examine the affected areas while healing began. This level of discomfort highlighted the vulnerability patients can feel when complications arise from aesthetic treatments.
After the media began asking questions, the clinic issued a response through La Vanguardia, with the clinic owner presenting a statement. The owner asserted that a treatment had been performed according to the established protocol and acknowledged that occasionally undesired results occur. The reply emphasized that all standard procedures were followed and that patient safety remained a priority throughout the process. A commitment to transparency was evident as the clinic noted its willingness to address the outcomes and provide support where possible.
According to the owner, the clinic made efforts to contact the former contestant to discuss the outcome and offer assistance. The owner claimed to have accompanied the patient to medical facilities when appropriate, but clarified that the patient did not permit others to accompany them. The statement also noted that in situations where a patient reports discomfort, the clinic does not dismiss concerns and recognizes that perception can vary significantly between individuals. This point was presented as a reminder of the subjective nature of pain and healing, and the responsibility to respond empathetically to all complaints.
Ultimately, the clinic representative spoke about the burns and their potential impact on the patient’s skin. While expressing confidence that the marks would fade over time, the owner asserted that the clinic would defend its reputation and take necessary legal measures if required. The tone of the message reflected a careful balance between accountability, patient care, and the defense of the staff involved, framed within a broader conversation about standards in cosmetic medicine. The exchange raised important questions about how clinics communicate outcomes, manage patient expectations, and ensure rigorous aftercare practices for those undergoing aesthetic procedures.
As this case continues to unfold, observers emphasize the need for clear guidelines on post-treatment care, comprehensive informed consent, and robust response protocols when adverse reactions occur. The discussion highlights the ongoing responsibility of clinics to monitor outcomes, document incidents, and support patients through recovery. In the Canadian and American contexts, the lesson is universal: safety, transparency, and compassionate care are essential components of any aesthetic service, especially when dealing with injuries that require medical attention and extended healing. Citations: La Vanguardia and related media reports provide ongoing context to the evolving situation, illustrating how public accountability intersects with clinical practice and patient rights.