Gohar Avetisyan’s former husband, Sergei Grigoryan, has filed a legal challenge related to their son, a move reported by Super. The dispute centers on questions about parentage and official records rather than a simple separation. Grigoryan described himself as a private individual who prefers not to disclose the intimate details of the family’s life, yet he confirmed that he was not listed on Gaspar’s birth certificate. Local reports indicate the couple was not married at the time the boy was born, a detail that adds complexity to the custody and administrative aspects of the case.
Grigoryan attributed what he called an early mistake to youth and misjudgment, a sentiment he shared in candid remarks about the situation. He did not elaborate on personal choices, but the admission points to ongoing sensitivity around the family matters involved.
Meanwhile, Avetisyan has chosen not to discuss the frequency of her visits with Gaspar or the role of a makeup artist who has been connected to her public image. This reticence keeps certain aspects of their relationship private, emphasizing the need to protect the youngster’s privacy amid a highly public spotlight.
Formerly, Avetisyan and Grigoryan were married for a brief period before divorcing in 2022. During their two years together, they raised their son, Gaspar. The artist has explained that the separation stemmed from a lack of support from her partner during challenging times. In December of the previous year, Avetisyan faced a serious health episode following surgery that led to a blood infection. She has shared that, during that difficult period, she felt she did not receive emotional support from her husband. Despite the rupture, Avetisyan has stated a commitment to maintaining an ongoing relationship with her ex-husband for the sake of their child, recognizing the importance of a stable co-parenting arrangement.
In past statements, Avetisyan has described herself without makeup as part of a broader discussion about authenticity and image in the public eye. This comment reflects a larger conversation about how public figures balance personal identity with professional visibility, especially when raising a child in the glare of media scrutiny.
As the case unfolds, observers note that the core concerns revolve around parentage documentation, parental responsibilities, and the practicalities of shared custody. The situation underscores how family disputes can intersect with public interest while still requiring careful handling to protect the child’s well-being. In Canada and the United States, similar family matters often navigate through courts with a focus on protecting the child’s interests and ensuring transparent, fair processes for birth records and custody decisions. The parties have indicated their intention to engage in dialogue aimed at reaching a resolution that prioritizes Gaspar’s stability and access to both parents.
Discussions surrounding the case have also touched on how appearances and branding influence public perception. The narrative demonstrates that a person’s public and private personas can diverge, especially when family dynamics are part of a broader career story. The emphasis remains on safeguarding the child’s best interests while allowing space for the parents to resolve the legal questions at hand in a controlled and respectful environment.
Ultimately, the situation reflects a broader trend where family law intersects with media attention. The parties are expected to continue negotiations and, if necessary, pursue judicial avenues that clarify parental rights, birth registrations, and daily caregiving arrangements. The hope shared by many viewers is that Gaspar will experience continuity, affection, and steady contact with both parents as the legal process moves forward, guided by care for the child’s emotional and developmental needs.