David Valldeperas recently appeared as a guest on the podcast Dear hater, offering listeners a clear statement about a rumored affair. He asserted that there was no romantic involvement with the person in question and emphasized a straightforward stance about his personal life. Paz Padilla, who has shared the same workplace with him for many years, spoke candidly about the matter, underscoring a sense of respect and good will toward her colleagues while maintaining a boundary between private matters and public roles.
Valldeperas conveyed a strong sense of affection for his colleagues. He appreciated the professional bonds and expressed a wish for continued happiness and success for everyone involved. During a public engagement, the presenter reflected on his focus and the importance of staying grounded. He noted that life includes many different experiences and that venturing into unfamiliar territory is not unusual for him. The practical advice he offered centered on living in the present moment and not dwelling on yesterday’s experiences. This phase of his life marks a shift, and he remains committed to the path ahead with a clear sense of purpose.
In a candid interview with Malbert, Valldeperas discussed the evolution of his mood and the dynamics within the show industry. He recalled a period when his experience on Akşam magazine was intense, but a gradual change occurred. He described a decline in energy and enthusiasm on the television program For a long time, relationships with some collaborators became strained, and the overall excitement for Sálvame diminished. He explained that the workload and the emotional toll of presenting a demanding show eventually led to a difficult phase. This shift did not come abruptly; it unfolded as a series of moments that transformed his involvement with the program into something less invigorating. The shift also touched the cast, with Belén Esteban and Paz Padilla contributing to the early momentum of the program Save me.
Valldeperas later emphasized that the absence of a current relationship with a former collaborator was deliberate. He acknowledged a long span of time since their last interaction and asserted that a mutual understanding had developed in professional life. He described how a misunderstanding occurred a few months later, one that caused disappointment. He felt that the other party perceived him as part of a group of enemies, which did not reflect reality. He defended his actions as guided by good intentions, explaining that he had interpreted a situation with honesty and transparency. In his view, a misread moment led to a misperception, and he expressed a commitment to clear communication to avoid repeating such issues in the future.