Milana Tyulpanova, formerly married to the football star Alexander Kerzhakov, became part of a high-profile financial tale during their divorce. Reports indicate she received a substantial sum, reportedly 150 million rubles, transferred to her through a bank card. This claim surfaced after Kerzhakov spoke about the matter on his personal blog, adding a layer of public curiosity to a private financial dispute. [Cited: entertainment press and social media discussions]
The couple, who tied the knot in a union that lasted several years, welcomed a son named Artemy in 2017. Following their separation two years later, court records placed the child in the care of Tyulpanova, with the court determining that she would raise the boy. Observers noted that Kerzhakov’s involvement in parenting appeared limited, with reports suggesting he provided little support for birthday celebrations and kept infrequent contact with his son. This dynamic has been a focal point in media coverage of the divorce, fueling ongoing conversations about parental responsibilities among public figures. [Cited: family court summaries]
Amid the churn of headlines, Tyulpanova has addressed other controversial moments linked to the same circle. She previously commented on public accusations involving Gerard Piqué and defended Shakira, positioning herself as a voice that weighs in on celebrity disputes beyond her own family matters. These remarks have contributed to a broader narrative about accountability and public behavior in the lives of professional athletes and their partners. [Cited: entertainment insider briefings]
As the story evolved, commentators and fans have debated the source and purposes of the large financial transfer, the exact timing of the divorce proceedings, and what constitutes fair financial and parental support in high-profile separations. While official documents provide the framework for custody and settlements, the public conversation continues to scrutinize the personal and financial entanglements that accompany celebrity marriages. In this context, Tyulpanova’s disclosures and Kerzhakov’s public comments have kept the topic alive, illustrating how private family matters can intersect with public perception and media narratives. [Cited: court records and media analyses]”