The recent winner of the so‑called new battle of psychics, magician Vlad Cherevaty, spoke openly in a conversation on Vokrug-TV about the pretenders who depend on showy props to ply their trade. He criticized those who fill a room with a glittering display of talismans, skull motifs, countless candles, and dramatic séances that aim to conjure spirits in a theatrical, almost fairy-tale fashion. In his view, such theatrics are not evidence of real power, but a performance designed to manipulate emotion and expectation.
“When a psychic enters the scene with tinsel on every surface, skulls everywhere, and a ring of hundreds of candles while he summons a spirit in a melodramatic, almost romantic way, it can feel like an ancient princess or some otherworldly figure will step through the veil,” Cherevaty remarked with evident frustration. He argued that genuine supernatural ability does not require external tools or ritual trappings to operate. The inner energy, he contends, resides within the person who channels it, not in the objects arrayed around them.
Nevertheless, Cherevaty conceded that in the context of complex, multi‑spirit sessions, there are moments when relics or ceremonial items might assist the practitioner in guiding a sequence of connections. Such tools, he suggested, could help stabilize the process and enhance the psychic’s capacity to hold and interpret multiple spirits or entities once the session is underway. He emphasized that the value of any instrument lies in its ability to support a clear intention and disciplined technique, rather than serving as a substitute for true capability.
In his analysis, the magician highlighted a broader dynamic within the field: as practitioners navigate an ever more crowded landscape of phenomena, the temptation to rely on spectacle grows. Yet the essence of legitimate practice, he argued, rests on discipline, ethical boundaries, and a transparent demonstration of skills that can be verified by calm, respectful scrutiny rather than by overwhelming visuals alone.
Cherevaty’s stance echoes a cautious stance within contemporary discourse on psychic work. He distinguishes between credible, experience‑based insight and the risk of sensationalism that can mislead audiences who crave quick, dramatic outcomes. His commentary arrives at a moment when audiences frequently encounter claims of extraordinary abilities and readily accept spectacular displays as proof of authenticity. The magician’s perspective invites readers to consider how true skill should appear—quiet confidence, reproducible results, and a clear explanation of methods—more than a bright, captivating stage show. (Vokrug-TV interview, 2024)
Beyond this, the conversation also touched on the public perception of media coverage. There was mention of upcoming Russian releases in cinema, including anticipated events that drew attention to how audiences engage with extraordinary themes, whether through film or live demonstrations. The discussion underscored the enduring fascination with the unknown and the ways in which media narratives shape expectations about what is possible in the realm of the unseen. The exchange offered a practical reminder: skepticism, when paired with an open mind, can help distinguish genuine inquiry from mere spectacle. The core message remained clear—credible exploration depends on integrity, disciplined practice, and a willingness to be tested under scrutiny, not merely on the lure of dramatic effects. (Vokrug-TV, 2024)