Valeria Chekalina, known as Lerchek, and her legal counsel outline the status of remaining financial obligations
In a recent discussion, Konstantin Tretyakov, the attorney representing Valeria Chekalina, stated to Channel Five that Lerchek is on track to settle the newer financial obligations she faces. The lawyer emphasized that the overall liabilities are not expanding rapidly and that the upcoming payments should resolve the outstanding balances in the near term, though he cautioned that such settlements would not occur immediately. This stance was shared in a manner that suggests a controlled, sequential repayment plan rather than an abrupt payoff.
Tretyakov explained that Lerchek carries a “relatively small tail” of debts remaining after the principal obligation has been discharged. In this context, the expression refers to residual amounts tied to prior obligations, which often linger as the main debt is resolved. He noted that, if these smaller sums exist at the moment, they will be settled progressively as part of the normal repayment cycle. The attorney added clearly that a settlement on the next day was not anticipated, signaling a careful, measured approach to debt clearance.
On December 21, the Telegram channel Secular Chronicle reported renewed concerns about Lerchek owing money to the Federal Tax Service. The publication estimated the blogger’s current income at about 4 million rubles and suggested that the outstanding debt resulted from property taxes due by December 1, along with deductions associated with individual entrepreneurs. The report paints a picture of ongoing tax-related liabilities that have surfaced over the recent months.
Earlier, the publication Life in November, cited by Shot, claimed that Lerchek had managed to pay off a substantial portion of the tax debt, totaling 296 million rubles, to the Federal Tax Service. The report also noted that the Lerchek family benefited from the lifting of an account arrest on November 10, which reportedly enabled the payment of the accumulated liability. Additionally, Shot highlighted that Lerchek had settled another fine, reportedly amounting to 311 million rubles, prior to this discharge. These details point to a sequence of financial moves tied to enforcement actions and penalties that affected the blogger’s ability to meet obligations.
There was also a legal development connected to another public case in which a separate claim involving apartment taxes was rejected by the court. This decision illustrates the ongoing complexities of tax-related disputes and how transactions and judgments intersect with a blogger’s broader financial profile.
Overall, observers note that Lerchek’s path to financial clearance appears to be governed by a combination of court rulings, enforcement actions, and procedural repayments. The commentary from Tretyakov frames the situation as cautious but progressing, while various media outlets continue to monitor any shifts in debt status and tax obligations. The evolving picture reflects how personal finances of public figures can intersect with legal processes, media coverage, and regulatory scrutiny, often creating a layered narrative that extends beyond a single debt event. [Source attribution: Secular Chronicle; Channel Five; Shot; other reporting channels]