State Duma Deputy Alexander Khinshtein shared his perspective on the television series The Boy’s Word via his telegram channel, arguing that it does not promote criminal culture. He emphasized that the show does not glorify crime and that it should not be read as propaganda for criminal subcultures. The deputy noted that before the project was released, conversations with the film’s producers underscored the clear boundary against presenting criminals in a positive light. This stance reflects a broader concern about how media portrays illegal activities and the impact of such portrayals on viewers, particularly younger audiences.
In his assessment, Khinshtein pointed to Brigade as a stark contrast. He argued that Brigade has often been used as a model for admiring criminals, with the characters depicted as strong, brave, noble, and for some audiences, even likable. The deputy suggested that the way these characters are framed can influence public perception, potentially shaping how viewers think about crime and those who commit it.
According to Khinshtein, it is unlikely that audiences who watch The Boy’s Word, including teenagers, would intend to imitate the fate of the show’s heroes. He noted that in the storyline, the consequences for the protagonists are unfavorable, which should deter imitation rather than inspire it. The deputy urged caution against jumping to conclusions about the show’s impact while also reaffirming the importance of responsible storytelling in media productions.
At the same time, the MP urged readers to withhold snap judgments, highlighting that the first season of The Boy’s Word has not yet concluded. He called for a careful, nuanced evaluation of the series as it develops, and for ongoing dialogue among lawmakers, creators, and audiences about how crime is depicted on screen and its potential influence on viewers across different age groups.
Note: This analysis reflects the need to balance creative expression with social responsibility in television storytelling. The discussion centers on how viewers interpret on-screen actions and the messages conveyed about crime, morality, and personal choices, and it underscores the importance of ongoing assessment as new episodes air.