Pop Star SHAMAN Cleared of Extremism Claims and Explains Statement on Song I Am Russian
Pop singer SHAMAN, whose real name is Yaroslav Dronov, addressed recent controversy surrounding his work and clarified the sequence of events for his audience. Following examinations by regional authorities, Dronov explained that a statement attributed to a member of the public alleging that the track I Am Russian promotes ethnic hatred was reviewed by the local police and later deemed not to constitute extremism. The artist reiterated that the song had already undergone the full spectrum of checks before its release and that it received clearance from the licensing and distribution platforms that dominate the Russian music scene, as well as from the major federal television channels that broadcast content across the country. This summary reflects official communications from the Tula Region Criminal Investigation Department, which sought clarification on the matter from the artist. The clarification was part of an ongoing process to verify the content of the track against rules that govern extremist materials in the nation, and the conclusion reached by authorities supported the view that the song did not violate those standards .
The track I Am Russian was released in the summer of 2022 and quickly gained traction within the country’s music scene. Its accompanying video was recognized on an international scale by being included in a respected compilation that highlights some of the most notable music videos from around the world, a testament to the production’s reach and artistic ambition .
In a broader context, readers should be aware of recent developments regarding other music works that have drawn attention from regulatory bodies. For instance, a separate composition titled Kill the Beggars, produced by a group known as Porn Films, was temporarily removed from and then restored to lists that designate certain materials as extremist after review. This sequence underscores the ongoing vigilance and the number of moving parts involved in how content is evaluated and categorized within the country’s regulatory framework. The case illustrates how authorities differentiate artistic expression from content that might be deemed harmful or unlawful by law and policy directives .