The producer behind the group Tender May, Andrei Razin, issued a public critique on Instagram after an incident on a popular talk show. He criticized Lera Kudryavtseva for a moment that captured wide attention when she splashed a guest with water during Andrei Malakhov’s program. Razin, who has a history of outspoken commentary, framed the confrontation as more than a single moment of television. He pointed to personal history and family dynamics as factors he believes are relevant to the incident, arguing that Kudryavtseva had long avoided contact with a former partner and his child, a detail he linked to the guest being present on the show in a way that raised questions in his view. He also suggested a broader pattern of behavior by Kudryavtseva, noting the absence of a sustained relationship with the guest’s son and casting the moment as a form of hypocrisy in public life.
In the exchange, Razin described a situation where the woman who was splashed found herself in shock, and he asserted a longstanding joke within an extended family circle that a certain child was raised by another guardian after the parent’s limited involvement over the years. He claimed that Kudryavtseva’s alleged past actions created a context in which the guest might feel judged and exposed, turning a private grievance into a televised confrontation. Razin’s remarks touched on personal history, alleging that Kudryavtseva had distances within family relationships that affected her own child’s life. He emphasized the tension between professional commitments and family responsibilities in a high-profile life, suggesting the dynamic had become a public mirror for many viewers.
Meanwhile, Kudryavtseva later commented on the circumstances surrounding the water incident, explaining the guest’s perspective on the moment and the emotional impact involved. She referenced the official accounts provided by the guest’s family, including statements from the guest’s son who spoke of his mother’s decision to step away from certain responsibilities and how this affected him and several siblings, one of whom has cerebral palsy. The family narrative described a teenager who grew up in a foster environment, eventually seeking to reconnect with the foster mother who had cared for him, a situation that added a layer of complexity to the public discussion about the incident. Observers noted that the guest’s family discussed feelings of abandonment and the challenges of balancing work with personal ties, and they highlighted how such experiences can shape a person’s response to media scrutiny.
In other related developments, there were mentions from other public figures connected to the broader media and cultural scene. A separate statement by an artist named Safronov referenced a work that would be displayed in a major transport hub, underscoring a continuing thread in the city’s cultural conversations about fame, memory, and public display. These comments were presented in a broader context of how public figures engage with audiences in public spaces and the ways in which art and media intersect in contemporary life. The conversations around these moments illustrate how public discourse often blends personal history with current events, prompting debate about accountability, empathy, and the boundaries of celebrity influence. The incident itself became a focal point for discussions about how televised moments can reflect deeper questions about family dynamics, responsibility, and the pressures that come with public life, especially for those who regularly navigate both personal and professional roles in the glare of national attention.