Russian Actor Plans Legal Action Over Personal Attacks Linked to Federal Prosecution Project
In a message shared on his Telegram channel, the actor Danila Kozlovsky announced his intention to take legal action against Vitaly Borodin, who leads a controversial Federal Security and Anti-Corruption Initiative. The actor asserts that Borodin has leveraged his influence not to confront corruption but to fuel personal publicity schemes. Kozlovsky accuses the political figure of repeatedly pushing the authorities to open new inquiries against well known public figures, effectively exhausting law enforcement resources with ongoing complaints directed at celebrities.
Back in April, Borodin publicly urged the head of Russia’s Interior Ministry, Vladimir Kolokoltsev, to examine Kozlovsky for alleged extremism. The accusation allegedly included claims that the artist holds foreign citizenship, earns money abroad, and advocates actions contrary to the government. Kozlovsky contends that these assertions are part of a calculated effort to bolster Borodin’s standing in a volatile political climate. He notes that the timing suggests a strategy aimed at gaining visibility rather than pursuing legitimate concerns about security or legality.
The artist, speaking alongside his legal team, says he has prepared formal complaints and views to prompt oversight of Borodin and the FPBK organization. Kozlovsky maintains that the current wave of accusations amounts to defamation, an intentional attempt to smear his public image. He stresses that the claims are groundless and misleading, arguing that they are wrapped in a veneer of patriotism that misleads the public and distorts the discussion around national issues.
Kozlovsky emphasizes the importance of humane conduct during challenging times. He expresses a personal commitment to acting with kindness and contributing positively to the country, even if that stance feels naive in the present moment. The actor says he will persist in his work across Russia to support cultural and artistic life, highlighting a determination to remain active and hopeful amid political tensions and social upheaval.
Vitaly Borodin is known for his outspoken stance toward prominent public figures. He has previously filed grievances regarding other artists and media personalities, including Alla Pugacheva, Leah Akhedzhakova, and television host Andrey Norkin. These actions have kept Borodin in the spotlight as a figure who frequently engages in high profile public disputes and uses formal channels to express grievances against celebrities. The broader context involves ongoing debates about the balance between anti corruption campaigns and the potential for political maneuvering that uses accusations to shape public perception.
Earlier, Kozlovsky publicly refuted rumors about holding American citizenship, reiterating that the allegations circulating about his personal status were unfounded. Amid the dispute, the actor remains focused on continuing his artistic work and contributing to the cultural landscape of the country, aiming to demonstrate resilience and integrity while the dialogue around these charges continues to unfold. The case underscores the tensions that can arise when public figures intersect with political campaigns, media narratives, and the strategic use of legal processes in a highly visible public arena. The outcome of the pending legal steps and official reviews will likely influence both reputational dynamics and public trust in the mechanisms meant to regulate corruption and protect political accountability. In the meantime, Kozlovsky and his teams stress the importance of due process and the right to defend one’s name against unsubstantiated accusations, urging observers to consider the difference between genuine concerns and orchestrated campaigns.
Notes on the evolving situation illustrate how public figures may navigate accusations that touch on citizenship, finances abroad, and calls to action against the government. The ongoing developments in this case will be watched closely by fans, legal observers, and policy analysts alike, with many hoping for clarity, fairness, and a measured response that respects both the rule of law and freedom of expression. The dialogue surrounding these events continues to reflect broader questions about the integrity of public discourse and the responsibilities of individuals who wield influence in the public eye, especially during difficult national moments.