The spokesperson for the artist, Yegor Kozlovsky, who is also the brother of Russian actor Danila Kozlovsky, spoke about the recent uproar in the State Duma. Deputies have called for a crackdown on all public appearances involving the actor, sparking a heated discussion about the limits of artistic expression and national sentiment. In conversation with socialbites.ca, Yegor Kozlovsky emphasized that Danila is aware of the situation but will not engage with politicians on the matter.
He noted that copies of the latest requests were circulating and suggested that Danila Valeryevich was not unaware of them. According to Kozlovsky, the information circulating publicly was not entirely accurate. He said that Danila had not left the country, and that throughout this period he remained active in Russia, performing on stage, taking part in film productions, and continuing his work in the industry. The question, he added, seemed peculiar in its intent. He answered by saying that there was no clear reason to respond to a claim without a concrete statement from the relevant authorities, and that the proper course would be to wait for an official reply to the inquiries that had been raised.
In another development, Dmitry Gusev, who serves as the first deputy chairman of the Fair Russia faction in the State Duma, reported having discussed the matter with the Minister of Culture. His proposal centered on whether it might be appropriate to consider canceling Danila Kozlovsky’s performances inside Russia. This stance was echoed by Dmitry Kuznetsov, a State Duma deputy, who urged the St. Petersburg Cultural Committee to preempt any stage appearances by the artist. The lawmakers referenced concerns about how the public perceives the artista’s stance in relation to current national events, and they voiced a desire for a clearer alignment between public performances and social expectations.
Earlier, Vitaly Borodin, who heads a federal initiative focused on security and anti-corruption, indicated that the Prosecutor General’s Office should examine whether Danila Kozlovsky had engaged in any actions that might discredit the military. The reported call for a formal review reflected ongoing anxiety about public figures and their influence amid sensitive moments for the nation. The media independently reported possibilities about the actor returning to Russia from the United States, while the Maly Drama Theater confirmed that Danila remained contracted to work with them, suggesting continued involvement in Russian stage and film projects.
Yegor Kozlovsky later appeared in Moscow and St. Petersburg to discuss upcoming schedules. He asserted that performances featuring Danila Kozlovsky would proceed on the planned dates and locations. During a broadcast, he clarified that the artist did not relocate to the United States and had not emigrated, reaffirming his client’s ongoing presence in the country. The ongoing dialogue between the arts community and government representatives underscored a broader conversation about the responsibilities of public figures, the impact of their choices on fans, and the expectations placed upon performance venues amidst national debates. In press encounters and private conversations alike, the party line remained consistent: Danila Kozlovsky would continue to contribute to Russian theater and cinema, while his team would respond to official inquiries through proper channels as they were issued.