An actor named Nikita Kologrivy faced accusations after an incident with a flight crew member, a stewardess, that reportedly left her with a bruise. The publication released an audio clip and screenshots of messages related to the event, prompting widespread discussion. The exchanges suggest a tense moment that escalated beyond what was initially expected, with one party asking for forgiveness and a promise of a bouquet of flowers in compensation for the upset caused during the encounter. The stewardess later commented that the situation included affectionate gestures that became uncomfortable and led to a heated exchange.
In one message, the actor expressed a desire for reconciliation, using a term of endearment and suggesting a gift to mend the friction. The stewardess replied with a humorous note, indicating she had never experienced such conduct before, accompanied by a laughing emoji. This exchange illustrates the difference in perceptions between the two individuals involved and highlights the ambiguous nature of the interaction as it was interpreted by the parties.
Prior to the incident in question, the woman indicated she hoped for a direct apology from the actor for what occurred. She described a sequence where cordial behavior initially gave way to behavior that she found inappropriate, including kissing and touching, followed by a confrontation. She noted that the altercation extended beyond the individual event, with heated language and confrontation directed at staff after the incident.
In related developments, the conflict in a public venue led to a legal action and temporary detention. A court in Novosibirsk ordered the actor detained for seven days on a hooliganism charge stemming from a drunken altercation in a bar. The case has drawn attention to the actor’s past, including his involvement in the entertainment program Star Factory and subsequent public opportunities.
Observers have reflected on how the episode fits into broader conversations about public behavior, accountability, and the treatment of service workers in tense situations. The unfolding narrative has prompted discussions about consent, professional boundaries, and the responsibilities of public figures when interacting with staff in high-pressure environments. The involved parties have offered varying perspectives, and the situation remains under review by the authorities as the case progresses for potential further legal steps. (Source: Paragraph)