Authorities faced questions as to why a criminal case was not opened against the pop star Philip Kirkorov after he allegedly shoved a security guard during a public event. Life reported on the development, noting that the incident had been handed to the Krasnogorsk city prosecutor’s office for review to determine whether the Ministry of Internal Affairs in the Pavshino district acted within legal bounds. The coverage added that a medical assessment described the guard’s injury as moderate, revealing a tear of the talofibular ligament after a fall from the stage and highlighting the potential implications for the case. Source attribution for this sequence is Life.
The timeline described involves a performance by Ani Lorak on September 27 when Kirkorov is accused of a rough push that resulted in the security officer spraining his ankle. In the wake of the incident, the guard reportedly sought counsel from attorney Sergei Vasiliev and activists connected with the Forty Forty movement to explore legal avenues. Prosecutors could consider charges of minor bodily harm that carry a speculative sentence up to several months in prison, depending on how the facts are weighed and the local statutes as interpreted by the courts. Source attribution for this sequence is Life.
Following the incident, Kirkorov’s legal representative, Alexander Dobrovinsky, indicated that a meeting with an inspector occurred soon after the event to review the circumstances. The parties reportedly reached a preliminary understanding, with details discussed to clarify what transpired during the altercation and to ensure that all aspects were accurately documented for any subsequent legal process. Source attribution for this sequence is Life.
Dobrovinsky suggested that after a widely publicized event featuring Nastya Ivleeva, there was an underlying motive to tarnish the artist’s reputation, although he asserted that Kirkorov remains outside immediate danger of legal action at that moment. The dialogue between the singer and investigators was framed as a routine step intended to resolve the matter without escalation, while observers noted that public discourse around the incident could influence perceptions regardless of formal outcomes. Source attribution for this sequence is Life.
In earlier discussions, Sergei Zhorin had explored the possibility that Kirkorov might bear responsibility for the altercation with the security guard, underscoring ongoing debate about accountability and the standards applied to high-profile figures during large-scale events. Source attribution for this sequence is Life.