Pelageya, the well-known singer, is appealing a court ruling concerning the division of assets gained together with her former husband, Ivan Telegin, who plays hockey. The case, which has drawn media attention, centers on how the market value of a share of a jointly owned house was calculated within the framework of ongoing enforcement proceedings. The singer’s legal representative, Philip Ryabchenko, stated that Telegin’s share was assessed incorrectly, prompting an appeal aimed at correcting the calculation without creating unnecessary losses for either party.
Ryabchenko emphasized that Telegin did not fully comply with the court’s decision regarding the division of property. In response, Pelageya sought a timely resolution through the courts, hoping to reach an agreement that minimizes disruption and financial impact for all involved, including any dependents. The case has been in motion since the two parties separated, with the formal divorce finalized in 2020, yet related legal disputes continue to unfold.
Recent developments have brought additional public interest. Reports circulated that Pelageya changed her surname following the dispute with Telegin. It was also mentioned that she initiated new litigation against her ex-husband, including a request to index the sums previously transferred to him. These movements point to a broader effort to reassess financial arrangements tied to their marriage and separation, a process that unfolds in parallel with property disputes and personal milestones.
On another note, on June 2, Pelageya shared a video showing a moment of distress: her daughter, who could not participate in a planned summer trip abroad due to a restriction imposed by the father. The child was supposed to travel to Turkey with her grandmother, a trip arranged by the grandmother herself. The emotional clip underscored how parental decisions in high-profile legal matters can ripple into family life, especially when travel plans and holiday arrangements intersect with the ongoing legal process.
Earlier discussions around the couple included broader public attention to scandals during pregnancy, with lesser-known details emerging from various statements and rumors. While these elements amplify public curiosity, the legal proceedings themselves focus on property division, financial settlements, and compliance with court orders, all within the framework of domestic dispute resolution. The overall narrative reflects not only a high-profile marital separation but also the practical, day-to-day consequences that arise when families navigate court-mandated settlements while pursuing stability for their children.
Observers note that ongoing litigation often extends beyond a single decision, especially in cases involving jointly acquired assets and future financial obligations. The aim of the involved parties remains to reach a fair distribution that respects prior agreements and current circumstances. In such situations, courts typically consider the market value of real estate, the duration of ownership, and any improvements or encumbrances that could affect overall equity. The outcome, while difficult, is intended to impose the least disruption possible on the family’s dynamics and the children’s welfare, balancing respect for individual rights with the obligation to settle shared financial matters.