Conversation with actress Olga Spirkina on prozvezd.info centers on a lawsuit involving her ex-husband Dmitry Konchalovsky and his current life as a public figure. Spirkina reveals strong emotions about the case and the events surrounding it, stating she is deeply unsettled by what she believes happened to her former partner. She asserts that Konchalovsky has enlisted the services of a lawyer who was once a sworn adversary, and she claims this shift in alliances has complicated their past relationship even further. According to her account, Konchalovsky blocked her from contacting him by phone, denying her attempts to communicate directly during a critical moment.
Spirkina reflects on her time with Nikita Mikhalkov writing into the family circle that surrounded Konchalovsky, noting that she always tried to be supportive and affectionate during the marriage. She describes her ex-husband as someone capable of happiness and kindness, yet she feels betrayed by him as the dispute unfolds. She adds that the current situation has left her puzzled and seeking answers, while hinting at forthcoming material that will address the tension between Konchalovsky and people she considers his adversaries. The actress suggests she will release a video in response to the alleged clashes and the dynamics of Konchalovsky with his foes, including images from moments she recalls as intoxicated or emotionally charged.
Earlier reports mentioned the ongoing conflict between Olga Spirkina and Dmitry Konchalovsky, framed by local media as a dispute over a personal matter rather than a commercial or professional one. The niece of Nikita Mikhalkov asserts that their shared past involved the purchase of a Mercedes vehicle, and she accuses her ex-spouse of improper actions regarding the sale of that vehicle. In recounting these events, she emphasizes how the relationship they once had influenced both their legal and personal trajectories, with the Mercedes matter acting as a focal point in their contested history. The narrative she presents is designed to provide clarity on the sequence of events and to challenge the interpretations currently circulating in broader discussions. This account is framed as part of an ongoing effort to bring transparency to the situation and to address rumors that have circulated in public spaces. For readers seeking context, the statements come with attribution from Spirkina herself as well as references to the surrounding legal dynamics. (Citation: prozvezd.info, interview and social commentary)