Nikita Kologrivy recently spoke about his experience in the podcast Without a Shift, revealing that he never watched the series The Boy’s Word, in which he portrayed the character Kashchei. He explained that the choice to participate in such projects often depends on a mix of personal interest and professional evaluation. From his point of view, many viewers may not fully grasp the nuanced decisions artists make when choosing assignments that align with their artistic standards and career goals. He pointed out that a show’s appeal can be shaped by more than the on-screen performance itself, emphasizing the broader context of production, direction, and audience expectations. The actor underscored that not every project resonates with him, even if it garners widespread attention or high viewership, because his priorities as a creator may shift toward other roles and narratives he finds more meaningful or challenging.
In discussing the show’s impact, Kologrivy suggested that the series benefited from a well-executed promotional strategy aimed at younger audiences who tend to re-evaluate their favorite programs as trends evolve. He noted that the marketing push helped cultivate a strong presence in the public psyche, even as the actor remained selective about his own involvement. He also highlighted that he recently delivered performances in other works that he regards with greater personal and artistic value. One role he cited with particular pride is Emelya in the film By the Command of Pike, which he regards as a standout moment in his career. The comparison underscores a broader theme: there is often more than one project vying for attention, and actors weigh how a role fits into their long-term creative trajectory.
The actor offered a candid reflection on Kashchei, explaining that the character’s portrayal presented little personal challenge because he already embodies a similar archetype in his craft. He stated that becoming Kashchei does not require a drastic departure from his established identity, and he believes his own life experience and upbringing give him a unique understanding of the character. In his view, authenticity comes from a deep familiarity with the character’s world, rather than from forced efforts to imitate or replicate someone else’s interpretation. He contrasted his stance with that of other colleagues, suggesting that those with different backgrounds may approach the role and its portrayal from a distinct vantage point. This perspective invites viewers to consider how an actor’s lived experience can shape the way a mythic or legendary figure is brought to life on screen.
Earlier remarks from Kologrivy touched on the broader reception of The Boy’s Word, noting that after the series achieved notable success, some of his industry peers faced questions about the pricing and value assigned to such projects. The discussion reflected ongoing debates about the economics of television production, where perceived market value, bargaining dynamics, and creative priorities intersect. The actor attempted to articulate a balanced view: while commercial success and audience engagement are important, they do not necessarily determine the artistic worth of every individual contribution. His reflections suggest a nuanced stance toward industry trends, where financial considerations coexist with a conviction about personal artistry and the timing of a performer’s career choices.