Controversy and Admiration Surrounding Nikita Dzhigurda and Nikita Kologrivy
The flamboyant actor and showman Nikita Dzhigurda publicly expressed a strong admiration for his colleague Nikita Kologrivy in a broadcast on Channel Five. In North American and Canadian media circles, Dzhigurda is a figure who thrives on sensational statements, and his words about peers frequently become topics of conversation beyond his home country. This latest exchange adds another layer to the long history of Dzhigurda’s public persona, where praise and provocation often walk hand in hand.
Dzhigurda agreed to appear in the film Koresh after he spotted Kologrivy in the casting lineup. He spoke openly about his affection for the artist, describing him in familial terms and signaling a special bond by referring to him as his grandson. The moment underscored a harmony he believed the project could create between two generations of performers, and it set a tone for a production that many anticipated would be saturated with intensity and meaning. What followed was a revelation of a relationship that transcends professional respect, one that the showman framed as a source of bright, purposeful energy within the filmmaking process.
During subsequent remarks, Dzhigurda explained that, once he learned Kologrivy would be involved and that he would be involved in a mission-like effort to “save the world” through the project, nothing else mattered to him. He indicated that he accepted the role not for notoriety but because the project carried a significant and meaningful charge, reinforced by his personal affection for Kologrivy. The sentiment was presented as more than sentimentality; it was portrayed as a driving force that gave the filming a brighter, more consequential edge in his view.
Around the same period, Dzhigurda noted that his public activities had shifted. He began to step out less frequently, a change he attributed to his involvement in a historical film project directed by a world-renowned filmmaker. According to him, contractual obligations prevented the disclosure of many details about the shoot, leaving fans and critics with only selective glimpses into the production’s scope and the intensity of the collaboration. The lack of specifics did little to dampen curiosity, as the pairing of a celebrated director and a larger-than-life performer kept audiences guessing about the project’s direction and ultimate impact.
Nikita Kologrivy’s public profile had already been complicated by a string of controversies that followed him into the spotlight. In the wake of his rise, the artist publicly challenged certain peers, criticizing untrained actors such as Sasha Bortich. He also took aim at Danila Kozlovsky’s acting talent, labeling him a “fake artist” and questioning the value of performances associated with The Boy’s Word. In the same breath, he expressed disapproval of classic Soviet stars Innokenty Smoktunovsky and Alexander Abdulov, signaling a provocative stance toward both contemporary and past figures in the industry. The remarks contributed to a climate of heated discourse that kept Kologrivy at the center of attention in entertainment circles across Russia and beyond, including audiences in Canada and the United States who follow global cinema gossip with interest and scrutiny.
In a development that drew further attention, on March 21 Kologrivy was placed in a special detention facility for seven days after a drunken altercation at a restaurant in Novosibirsk. The incident added another layer to the artist’s public narrative, fueling ongoing debate about the line between artistic charisma and personal conduct, and how such episodes influence an artist’s career trajectory in a highly media-driven industry. Observers in North American media markets noted how incidents like this tend to amplify the already controversial status of public figures who frequently court headlines and polarized reactions from fans and critics alike.
Earlier remarks from Anastasia Ukolova mentioned filming with Nikita Kologriv, contributing to a broader conversation about collaborations with the rising star. The cumulative record of statements, missteps, and on-camera moments paints a portrait of two performers whose careers are deeply interwoven with controversy, loyalty, spectacle, and ambition. This ongoing narrative remains of interest to audiences well beyond the duo’s native territory, with Canada and the United States among the regions where international watchers monitor the evolving dynamic between Dzhigurda and Kologrivy and the media ecosystems that amplify their every move.