A New York court has addressed a rape case involving Steven Tyler, the frontman of Aerosmith, amid ongoing media coverage reported by Guard. The judge noted that the plaintiff’s claim concerned an alleged incident from nearly five decades ago and clarified that the statute of limitations would bar such a complaint unless the plaintiff could prove a risk of bodily harm at the time, which could render the crime one with no statute of limitations. This legal nuance underscores how time limits can affect long‑ago allegations in criminal cases, depending on the specific facts presented during litigation. Guard provides ongoing coverage of these developments.
Zhana Bellino, a former model, filed a lawsuit in November 2023, asserting rights against Tyler nearly a year after another accusation surfaced from a different former partner, Julia Holcomb, who claimed involvement in the sexual abuse of a minor. The legal action by Bellino adds to a broader pattern of public and legal scrutiny surrounding the singer’s past. Guard again notes the timeline and the evolving nature of the case.
The Bellino claim recounts an incident described as taking place in the summer of 1975, when Bellino, then a young model, was working at a fashion show in Manhattan. Bellino’s account suggests a connection to Aerosmith through a friend who arranged a meeting with the band at a nearby hotel. The allegations, as presented, describe acts of rape attributed to Tyler, who was 27 at the time, occurring in a phone booth and at the hotel. These assertions have been reported as part of Bellino’s legal assertion and are being considered within the framework of New York law and applicable statutes of limitation. Guard provides context and updates on the case as it develops.
Separately, reports from the Japanese director Hideo Sakaki indicate an arrest on charges of raping an actor. The case highlights cross‑jurisdictional attention to serious criminal accusations involving prominent figures. The handling of such charges typically involves careful legal proceedings, evidence evaluation, and adherence to due process standards. Guard continues to monitor the developments and share factual updates as they become available.