At MUZ-TV, a formal statement was issued regarding the appearance of Ukrainian artist Max Barskikh during the network’s award ceremony. The message emphasizes that the channel’s official channels are the sole reliable source for accurate information about the event. It notes that MUZ-TV maintains content integrity across its official site and its verified social media accounts, and it warns audiences to disregard any information circulating through unofficial or pirated channels. The channel encourages viewers to rely on MUZ-TV’s own platforms for confirmation and details, highlighting the importance of cross-checking with official accounts to avoid spreading rumors or misinformation. This stance is presented as a measure to protect fans and the public from misleading claims about the ceremony and its participants, including statements or appearances that may be misrepresented in other outlets. The communication underscores the channel’s commitment to transparency and accuracy, urging audiences to trust only content published through MUZ-TV’s official domains and verified social profiles. The emphasis on official sources is framed as a safeguard against misinformation and a reminder of the channel’s responsibility to provide trustworthy coverage of its events. (Attribution: MUZ-TV official communication)
In a separate development, former contestant Yana Poplavskaya reportedly filed a formal inquiry with MUZ-TV’s award organizers. The aim of the submission was to seek clarification regarding the inclusion of Max Barskikh’s performance in the program. The concern cited public statements attributed to the artist that have been described as anti-Russian, which allegedly influenced the decision to feature his act in the lineup. The involved parties were urged to offer a detailed explanation of the selection criteria and the way in which such statements are weighed in the programming process. This request appears to reflect broader expectations among some viewers for clarity about how political positions are treated within entertainment events and how those positions impact casting and event programming. The discussion illustrates a broader dynamic in which audiences expect transparency about the guidelines that govern participant selection and the handling of public stances in relation to televised performances. (Attribution: event organizers and public record)