Mutabor nightclub faced a month-long shutdown after police officers and the consumer rights watchdog conducted inspections tied to a controversial event hosted by influencer Nastya Ivleeva. Reports linked to the incident suggested the investigation was connected to organized activity at the venue, as reported by Life, which cited sources close to the case.
The formal justification for the closure, according to the source, centered on violations of regulations governing the retail sale of alcohol. Authorities alleged breaches in licensing and compliance checks that triggered the temporary suspension of the club’s operations while the matter was under review.
During the shutdown period, the organization announced that it was in the process of planning upcoming New Year celebrations, signaling a shift in focus toward renewing events after the enforcement actions. The situation drew public attention as management prepared to address inquiries from authorities and the media while ensuring safety standards and compliance were reaffirmed for future gatherings.
The highly publicized party titled “Almost Naked” took place on December 20 at the Mutabor venue, with the event’s dress code encouraging attendees to arrive in minimal attire. The concept drew significant media coverage and public commentary as attendees, including Ivleeva, faced criticism for the provocative theme and the open display of outfits that skirted conventional norms for such occasions.
Following the event, Ivleeva issued a public apology, addressing the audience and followers in an effort to acknowledge the backlash and to request consideration from the broader audience. Several prominent guests who attended the party also expressed regret over their participation, signaling a collective response from the event’s attendees amid ongoing public scrutiny.
On December 27, searches and inquiries took place at Ivleeva’s offices in connection with reports that the Federal Tax Service had launched an audit. The investigation was described in local media as part of ongoing efforts to examine financial and tax-related aspects linked to Ivleeva’s activities and associated enterprise structures.
In a separate development, a former collaborator or associate of Ivleeva, referenced as rapper Vacio in some reports, issued an apology related to the event. The episode included unusual fashion requests tied to the party, with claims that a peculiar item of apparel—described in some sources as genital socks—was singled out as part of the costume choices by certain attendees. The remarks surrounding this incident contributed to the broader conversation about the event and its reception, underscoring the provocative nature of the party and the ensuing public discourse.