The pop icon Lolita Milyavskaya recently opened up about why she chose to seal her fifth marriage with a prenuptial agreement, this time with her partner Dmitry Ivanov. In a candid moment on the YouTube program Question with an Edge, she recalled a past marriage that ended without any formal agreement and left her with nothing. The experience became a turning point that shaped her approach to later relationships and finances.
She explained that the decision to use a contract in the most recent union came after she realized the risk involved. There was a moment when she feared losing a home she had earned or received as a gift from a previous spouse. She noted that the agreement was put in place after the vows, and the conversation with her partner allowed them to acknowledge the reality of the situation. The contract, she said, played a role in preventing a worst‑case scenario from unraveling their lives together. A relative might have insisted on it, and that emphasis helped her see the practical value of having protections in place. If that insistence had not happened, she believes the outcome could have been far more damaging.
Lolita and her fifth husband shared about a decade of life as a couple. The relationship faced a severe test when suspicion and betrayal entered the picture, ultimately leading to a separation. After the split, disputes arose as the former couple navigated the terms of the prenuptial agreement, with one side challenging the agreement that had been set before or during the marriage. The legal discussions highlighted how such contracts can influence post‑divorce proceedings and the sharing of assets after a long partnership.
Looking ahead, the artist indicated that she is not ready to formalize another union in the near future. She has been seeing a new partner for several months, but the idea of marriage with all the bureaucratic steps involved, including potential changes to property and document status, feels like more than she wants to undertake at this moment. She described the process as heavy with paperwork and formalities, and she emphasized that the time is not right for marriage despite the affection she feels for her current partner.
In reflecting on past experiences, Lolita acknowledged the impact of unemployment and betrayal that followed earlier separations. Those challenges contributed to a broader perspective on what makes a relationship work and what kind of commitments feel sustainable in the long run. Her story underscores how personal history, financial security, and emotional wellbeing can shape decisions about marriage and legal arrangements. She remains pragmatic about her future, focusing on personal stability and mutual understanding with her current partner rather than rushing into a formal union.