TV presenter and blogger Ksenia Borodina spoke openly on Instagram about her approach to her children’s relationship with their father. She noted that she does not block or restrict communication between her daughters and their dad. The stance, she explained, is to allow and encourage contact, even if there are complexities in the family dynamic that make that contact challenging. She suggested that ideally, the child’s right to know and maintain a relationship with both parents should be supported by the adults involved, arguing that time and attention are essential for children as they grow. When parents are unavailable, Borodina believes children will form their own conclusions about their upbringing, which is not easy to observe but is a reality many families face. Her perspective underscores the importance of preserving lines of communication for the sake of the children’s emotional health and sense of security, even in the face of disagreements or difficult circumstances between the adults.
In discussing her living arrangement and daily responsibilities, Borodina affirmed that she shoulders the bulk of parenting duties on her own. She pointed out that she handles day-to-day care, planning, and decision-making, while financial support from one of the children’s fathers continues to come in as required by law. This financial support acts as a safety net, ensuring the kids have what they need while the household navigates the complexities of shared parenthood. The arrangement reflects a common scenario where a parent takes primary responsibility for raising the children, while a separate agreement or mandate ensures the necessary monetary backing from the other parent.
In recounting her past, Borodina shared that she divorced her second husband in 2021. Their union produced her youngest daughter, Theona, while she also has a 14-year-old daughter from a previous relationship with a businessman. She described the financial dynamics with her ex-husband as challenging, noting that he did not provide substantial financial help and saw his daughter only a few times each year. Despite these difficulties, Borodina expressed no resentment toward him, suggesting that future life experiences and consequences may lead to different outcomes for him. She emphasized that the decision about money and presence in their children’s lives is not about blame, but about managing what is best for the kids given the adults’ circumstances. The focus remains on the children’s welfare and the steady support that can help them thrive through transitions.
There was a previous remark attributed to Borodina regarding how laws regulate family introductions and blended family situations. She mentioned that legal provisions can limit how a new partner is introduced to a child, highlighting the importance of navigating relationships with sensitivity and care within the bounds of the law. The broader message she conveyed centers on prioritizing the children’s stability, consistent routines, and ongoing access to both parents, while recognizing that legal and personal boundaries shape how a family evolves after separation. In all, the narrative paints a portrait of a parent managing public life, personal resilience, and the practical realities of co-parenting in a modern family.