Activist Vitaly Borodin shared details from a Telegram channel, noting that lawyers for Philip Kirkorov discussed the artist’s physical appearance in the ongoing case against Lyubov Uspenskaya. Borodin recounted that the court proceedings included a claim about Kirkorov having enhanced his buttocks at the gym, a remark he described as baseless and insulting. He added that this particular point reveals a troubling lack of respect within society and echoes a broader pattern of stingy claims that undermine credibility. In Borodin’s view, the remarks about Kirkorov should be seen as part of a wider attack on personal dignity rather than a legitimate assertion about health or fitness.
According to the activist, another allegation raised during the hearing claimed that Kirkorov allowed a young man in Turkey to touch his buttocks. Borodin argued that such allegations are inappropriate for court consideration and should not influence a person’s public reputation or professional standing. He asserted that Uspenskaya should be treated with respect and that crafting a bias through sensational claims harms both parties involved and the public discourse. The activist believes that these episodes contribute to a broader debate about recognizing artistic achievements while safeguarding personal dignity.
The case also centers on a dispute over a controversial statement in which Kirkorov allegedly described Uspenskaya as a beggar. Uspenskaya responded with a demand for 10 million rubles in moral damages, accompanied by a philological review that evaluated the remarks as an attempt to humiliate and discredit her. The review examined language used in a media interview where Uspenskaya was said to have begged for clothing, and the term aimed to demean her public image. The legal action emphasizes the seriousness with which both parties view the impact of public statements on personal reputation and the boundaries of artistic discourse in Russia.
On June 24, Kirkorov’s side of the case stated that there was no settlement agreement with Uspenskaya. The denial highlighted the ongoing nature of negotiations or the lack thereof, depending on later developments in the civil dispute. This public clarification contributes to the evolving narrative surrounding the case and the expectations of both sides as the legal process unfolds. The dispute raises questions about how entertainment celebrities manage conflict publicly and how civil actions can shape the legacy of widely known figures in the music industry.
Earlier, Uspenskaya’s legal representatives responded to the threats and claims raised during the proceedings, underscoring their commitment to defending the singer’s reputation. The dialogue between the parties reflects the broader dynamics at play in high-profile defamation cases within the entertainment world, where language choices and perceived slights can lead to significant legal and social consequences. Observers note that the outcome of the case could influence how similar disputes are treated in courts and by media outlets, shaping the standards for accountability in public statements by prominent artists.