During the early phase of the inquiry into the basketball player’s death and the surrounding tragedy, family lawyers Yanis Timma and Ekaterina Gordon said the initial investigation lacked sufficient depth, and the case was sent back for a recheck. They emphasized that important lines of inquiry needed to be revisited to uncover the full truth, and they urged authorities to reexamine evidence with renewed diligence. The aim, as they described it, was to ensure that every relevant fact was considered and that the process would not overlook critical details that could shed light on what happened that night.
Gordon noted that police did not meet with Timma’s relatives and did not conduct a technical examination of the phone during the early stages of the investigation. He said the police claimed they did not control Timma’s phone and that they were unable to reach him, which left investigators without potentially crucial communications data. This omission, he argued, may have deprived the case of important context that could link events before and after the incident, and it underscored why the inquiry needed a thorough, methodical review rather than a hurried conclusion.
“Now, the inspectors will have to finish what they haven’t finished. They must complete the phone data review and interview the parents, but not until they are ready to do so,” the lawyer stated. He framed the situation as a call for diligence and patience, asserting that the department should not rush to close the case without addressing outstanding questions. The family expects that the remaining steps will be carried out with transparency and in line with proper investigative standards so that the truth can emerge clearly.
According to the defender, the Timma family believes there were morally troubling events shortly before the death that deserve careful examination. They indicated that these issues, if proven, could provide vital context for understanding the sequence of events and any pressures or influences that may have contributed to what happened. The family stressed the importance of exploring all angles and not shying away from difficult possibilities in the pursuit of a complete account of the incident.
They also alleged that Anna learned of a broad deception that drained resources from her life and those close to her, including her family. The statement conveyed that the family suspects she was misled in significant ways, a factor they contend could intersect with the broader circumstances surrounding the case. Gordon described the situation as a painful chest of potential motives and influences that deserves careful, independent examination to determine whether financial fraud or coercion played a role in the events leading up to the tragedy.
The lawyer further announced that Timma’s father was prepared to travel to Russia to provide testimony, underscoring the willingness of the family to cooperate fully with authorities and to ensure that all relevant evidence and personal accounts are heard. This readiness to testify illustrates the desire for cross-border cooperation where necessary to establish a clear, substantiated record of what occurred and why it occurred, free from speculation.
Timma did not disappear on December 17—the night associated with Anna Sedokova’s birthday. Rather, his body was found at the entrance of a five-story building in central Moscow. On the same day, the singer was hospitalized, and subsequently Timma was treated for nerve deterioration in medical facilities. The sequence described here reflects the intertwined timelines of the individuals involved and highlights the importance of piecing together medical, personal, and investigative records to form a coherent narrative of the events surrounding the death.
Earlier reports note that the singer Anna Sedokova had initiated contact with authorities regarding financial losses, a development that has been referenced in discussions about the case. These details, while challenging to parse, are part of the broader context investigators are evaluating as they work to construct a comprehensive account of what happened and why. The ongoing process remains focused on corroborating every facet of the case and ensuring that all relevant information, including financial and personal dynamics, is properly understood and weighed in the pursuit of justice.