The management company filed a lawsuit against actor Mikhail Porechenkov. The Telegram channel reports this.
The case centers on two unpaid garbage collection bills tied to his two substantial apartments on Shmitovsky Proezd. In total, Porechenkov allegedly owes 6,599 rubles. The coverage notes that the actor had left his accounts unsettled for four months before the matter reached the courts. A court hearing was scheduled for August 6 to address the debt and determine next steps.
Later, toward the end of August, a report surfaced that the actor, known for his role in the series National Security Agent, had launched a civil action against utility providers over the outstanding charges. Separately, Honored Artist of Russia Andrei Merzlikin and his wife Anna Osokina were reported to owe 162 thousand rubles to a housing developer in the Ochakovo-Matveyevsky district of Moscow. According to Mash, the debt arose after neighbors repeatedly ignored utility notices since late November 2023, and Merzlikin refused payment, prompting the company to pursue collection actions. The public records indicate an ongoing dispute over how the charges were calculated and who bears responsibility for late or disputed payments.
In another development connected to traffic enforcement, Merzlikin was issued two fines by the traffic police, each amounting to one thousand rubles. These details illustrate a broader pattern of financial strain or dispute surrounding several public figures and their obligations to utilities and regulatory authorities. While these reports focus on private debt matters, they also highlight how arrears and penalties can escalate into formal legal or administrative actions, even for well-known personalities.
The situation surrounding these cases has attracted media attention and commentary about how celebrities manage personal finances amid high public visibility. Observers note that when prominent figures face debt collection or penalties, the stories can become a barometer for broader issues such as housing costs, municipal services, and the integrity of payment systems. Authorities emphasize that debt resolution procedures are consistent for all residents, regardless of fame, and that timely communication with service providers often helps prevent escalation. The ongoing coverage—documented through reports by Mash and other outlets—serves to remind readers that legal processes and financial obligations do not pause for celebrity status. The discourse also touches on the role of authorities in enforcing payments and the potential consequences for those who fall behind on bills or fail to respond to notices.