Alena Zhigalova, a journalist and author, drew public attention after replying to criticism about eating guinea pigs on a television segment hosted by Nastya Ivleeva. The moment sparked widespread commentary and conversations about cultural food norms and media accountability. Zhigalova’s remarks appeared within Ivleeva’s show, a program known for featuring bold, provocative dining experiences that frequently go viral in online communities. The incident — documented by sources familiar with the program — shows how travel experiences can influence attitudes toward exotic dishes and how media personalities handle controversy in real time.
Zhigalova highlighted Ivleeva, a traveler with extensive journeys, has tried a diverse array of unusual foods. Their exchange touched on a broader dialogue about what is deemed acceptable or surprising in global cuisine. Zhigalova noted that Ivleeva’s itinerary has included cockroaches, crocodile, and zebra meat, all of which appear in various cultures as part of local culinary traditions. She stressed that guinea pig, a delicacy in some restaurants and a staple in certain regional cuisines, fits within a wide gastronomic spectrum.
Additionally, Zhigalova pointed out foods that are more common in specific regions, mentioning that beaver fries can be found in Altai, where she recently traveled. She observed that bear meat, roe deer, and venison can be purchased in shops and markets in certain areas. The central point she raised was that encountering such meat did not provoke the same level of public surprise as guinea pig dining. This contrast illustrates how familiarity with regional specialties can shape perceptions of what is acceptable to eat.
Regarding meat bans, Zhigalova advocated for a formal, policy-oriented approach. She suggested that if a ban on meat were under consideration, it would require the publication of concrete laws and general guidelines through official channels. Without formal documentation, she argued, debates risk appearing hypocritical and sensationalized. For her, this issue was not the story that should dominate national discourse when other matters require attention from the public and policymakers. Her stance emphasizes measured, policy-focused discussions instead of media-driven sensationalism.
Following the episode, Ivleeva issued an apology on her Telegram channel for broadcasting the guinea pig segment and subsequently removed the episode from circulation. The corrective action reflects sensitivity around food-related debates and the responsibilities of media figures when sharing provocative material. The incident serves as a case study in how public figures manage backlash and communicate with audiences after airing controversial content.
In a separate moment of celebrity generosity, Drake previously surprised a fan at a concert by presenting a luxurious handbag, an act that captured attention and spurred discussion about fan appreciation and celebrity philanthropy. This instance stands apart from the main debate about food and media coverage but contributes to a broader narrative about public figures and audience engagement in today’s media landscape.