In a developing case connected to actress Kristina Babushkina, her husband, Andrey Gatsunaev, did not oppose the court-ordered house arrest in a petition tied to accusations of drug trafficking and violence against a police officer, according to REN TV coverage. The information originated from the Moscow Zamoskvoretsky Court, which confirmed that the house arrest ruling for Gatsunaev has entered into force. The Zamoskvoretsky court made the statement, noting that Gatsunaev’s attorney initially filed an appeal but later withdrew the complaint. The record also indicates that an inspector had asked the court to place Gatsunaev in a pre-trial detention facility as a preventive measure, but the court chose house arrest instead.
Earlier reports indicated that Kristina Babushkina’s husband, Andrey Gatsunaev, served as a witness in the drug possession investigation, with the actress herself questioned by investigators from the Investigative Committee.
On June 16, authorities detained a car carrying Babushkina and her husband during a routine stop. In the course of the search, law enforcement officers discovered a small packet containing drugs weighing about 0.53 grams. During the detention, Gatsunaev reportedly attempted to swallow the drugs and allegedly bit a traffic police officer on the finger in the process. The incident has sparked renewed attention on the ongoing case and the subsequent court action.
This case has drawn public interest due to the involvement of a well-known public figure and the sequence of events around the arrest, the seized substance, and the legal response by the court. Official updates continue to circulate through regional judicial channels, with media outlets summarizing the court’s position and the parties’ legal maneuvers. The episode stands as part of a broader pattern in which initial detentions and subsequent legal appeals interact with the procedures of pre-trial detention decisions and house arrest orders in high-profile drug-related matters. The information presented here is drawn from court communications and police reports, with independent observers noting the evolving nature of the case and the ongoing role of investigators in pursuing the facts surrounding the alleged drug possession linked to the couple. Source attributions are provided for context and transparency.