A heated exchange unfolded on a recent broadcast about the growing trend of online education, specifically the rise of courses offered by a blogger named Elena Blinovskaya. Critics argue that the popularity of these programs is not proof of quality, and some viewers believe that the credentials behind such courses are often unclear or questionable.
During the discussion, one participant recalled an earlier TV appearance where Blinovskaya’s explanations left more questions than answers. The sentiment was that the speaker could not clarify the terms being used, leading to skepticism about the validity of the material being taught. The claim was also circulated that several universities allegedly associated with Blinovskaya could not substantiate any formal link to the blogger, raising doubts about the educational legitimacy of the program.
Another voice on the program suggested that readers and students should instead turn to traditional psychology books. The argument is that written works provide a stable foundation for personal insight, whereas online seminars may offer a different, less reliable form of guidance. A well-known performer in the program acknowledged participating in Blinovskaya’s courses and defended the idea of the online format, noting that the content encourages self-directed study and continuous participation in new sessions. The performer also remarked that many people simply do not experience real growth from reading psychology texts alone.
There was a sharp reaction to the criticism itself. One contributor contended that the popularity of Blinovskaya’s approach stems from a broader hunger for accessible self-help resources, and not from a strict endorsement of every claim presented in the seminars. The remark implied that the appeal lies in an easy path to self-understanding, even if the depth and rigor of the material may vary from course to course.
Another participant reflected on memories from the 1990s, noting that the same individual now presents a modern lineup of online offerings that attract new followers. The discussion acknowledged that the blogger’s marathon style of delivery is a notable development for audiences, and that many people view these programs as a convenient entry point into psychology. The conversation also touched on how technological changes have broadened access to educational content, enabling a wider public to explore topics that were once the domain of formal institutions.
Overall, the broadcast captured a moment when viewers weighed the credibility of online education against traditional sources. It highlighted the tension between convenience and scholarly rigor, while underscoring a persistent curiosity about the methods used in self-improvement programs. The participants agreed that discerning quality in online courses requires critical thinking, careful review of course outlines, and a comparison with established psychological literature for anyone seeking genuine personal growth.