During rapper Mayot’s concert in St. Petersburg, security forces arrived with sniffer dogs and halted the show shortly after it began. The intervention unfolded in a brisk, controlled manner, with officers moving through the venue to search for illegal substances. Reportedly, narcotics checks were part of the operation, and the situation was described by a Telegram channel as a methodical sweep rather than a chaotic disruption. Attendees were prepared for the checks and expected routine verification steps as part of the security protocol surrounding large public performances.
According to the Telegram channel coverage, the operation involved dogs trained to detect drugs, and the emphasis was clearly on checking the presence and use of prohibited substances. In practice, security personnel moved through seating aisles, entryways, and corridors to identify any suspicious items or activity. Spectators and staff were briefed that such screenings were a standard precaution for this event, and the message circulated that anyone found with illegal substances would be subject to the appropriate legal consequences. The overall tone of the reports suggested a controlled and orderly process aimed at safeguarding attendees and staff alike.
With a broadcast caption reading Attention, news, access to the Base club on Kondratyevsky Prospekt was halted, and paddy wagons were positioned at the entrance. The scene reflected a formal security operation rather than a routine venue closure, as barricades and police presence signaled a heightened level of control. Eye-witness accounts noted police cordons surrounding the entrance, while patrons waited outside under the watch of officers who managed entry and exit with calculated precision. The combination of warnings and visible law enforcement created an atmosphere of heightened vigilance around the facility that night.
Riot police organized raids across several Moscow clubs on the night of November 30. Reports describe officers arriving at Mono around 1:30 p.m. and proceeding to load attendees into paddy wagons. In Arma, guests inside the venue were ordered to lie face down on the floor as part of the security checks. At the same time, one venue was hosting themed parties and a mask show was scheduled for the evening, while plans for a Delta party at Old Mutabor were announced. The sequence painted a picture of aggressive crime-control measures intersecting with nightlife, where event-goers faced rapid checks and crowd-management procedures as authorities enforced their security agenda.
Later, the Ministry of Internal Affairs explained that in a club on Skladochnaya Street, propaganda for LGBT ideology was observed. The statement identified the International Social Movement of LGBT as extremist and banned within the territory of the Russian Federation. During the inspection, smartphones, laptops, video cameras, and other related items were seized following a procedural decision. The disclosure underscored the authorities’ focus on prohibited content and the broader legal framework they invoked to justify the actions taken at the venue, highlighting the clash between cultural expression and regulatory constraints that night.
Earlier discussions in Russia had suggested banning a Pushkin fairy tale on grounds of LGBT propaganda, reflecting ongoing debates about cultural policy and public morality. The conversation around this classic literary work revealed a climate in which artistic and educational content could become entangled with political and ideological considerations. The episode illustrated how state authorities, cultural institutions, and segments of society navigated the complexities of values, legality, and public messaging in a modern context.