Blogger under scrutiny after education licensing questions and on-site incident at seminar

No time to read?
Get a summary

A Rostov region report raises questions about the activities of a blogger and coach identified as Inna Tliashinova. According to a broadcast from REN TV, there are claims that she conducted educational activities without the consent of the regional Ministry of Education and Science. The report notes that the ministry did not authorize her to run seminars and training programs, casting doubt on the legality of some of her public offerings. On her own website, Tliashinova asserts that she holds a license from the department mentioned, a claim that authorities are currently examining to determine its validity. These developments have prompted observers to review the licensing and accreditation requirements that govern educational services and professional training in the region. [Source attribution: REN TV]

In her public communications, Tliashinova describes herself as the founder of the International Academy of Quantum Psychology and as the author of a method she calls Master of Analysis. She runs seminars that are pitched as opportunities to address psychological concerns and, for some attendees, a pathway to practicing psychology. Participants are said to receive a certificate described as an international standard upon completion of the program. The distinctions between professional qualification and consumer education in these settings are under scrutiny, and authorities are weighing whether such certifications meet recognized standards. [Source attribution: Tliashinova’s own materials]

On January 28, a confrontation occurred near the entrance of a venue hosting a seminar led by Tliashinova. Izvestia reported that Natalya Grafchikova, a journalist, was assaulted during the encounter and subsequently removed from the building by security personnel. The journalist was left with a facial hematoma and bruising to the head and limbs, and there were concerns about a possible concussion. The incident has been linked by some observers to fears about regulatory scrutiny and potential tax investigations connected to the organizer. [Source attribution: Izvestia]

Following the incident, Grafchikova was interviewed as a witness, and investigations have continued to assess the sequence of events and the responsibilities of the seminar staff. Legal representatives in related cases have remarked on the broader implications for media safety and the accountability of organizers who oversee public events. [Source attribution: Izvestia]

Separately, in a related matter, discussions around parole prospects have resurfaced in another high-profile case. Lawyers have been evaluating the likelihood of a parole decision for actor Mikhail Efremov, outlining factors that influence such outcomes and the potential timelines involved. Although not directly connected to the seminar matter, this discourse underscores how legal processes intersect with public interest and media coverage across high-profile cases. [Source attribution: Legal press]

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

Invasion Festival Postponed to Next Year: Refunds, Tickets, and Public Support

Next Article

Sergei Belikov Reflects on Decades of Exclusion from Major Media Platforms (Source: mk.ru)