Singer Anna Semenovich discussed a very personal financial step she took, revealing in an interview with journalist Alena Zhigalova how much she spends to preserve her fertility. The revelation centers on the important decision she made to freeze her eggs, a move she describes as both pragmatic and empowering for her future plans. The candid conversation sheds light on the practical side of celebrity life, where private choices intersect with public interest, and where the costs of medical procedures can become part of a larger life narrative.
Semenovich disclosed that the entire egg-freezing process came with a substantial price tag, amounting to 160 thousand rubles. She explained that she chose to undergo the procedure at a clinic known for its high level of care and advanced facilities, a decision she believes was worth the investment in her long-term reproductive options. The timing of the procedure, she noted, was deliberate: she managed to freeze her eggs before she faced a major health challenge related to COVID-19, an event that underscored for her how unpredictable life can be and how important it is to have options for the future. In her view, securing her eggs was a form of self-care and an act of resilience in the face of uncertainty.
“I insured myself. I have eggs – healthy, good, genetically tested, I can use them to conceive a child,” she shared, emphasizing the practical benefits of the choice. The statement reflects a broader trend among public figures who prioritize family planning and personal autonomy. By highlighting the health and genetic viability of the stored eggs, Semenovich also speaks to the confidence she has in the quality of the preservation method and the care provided by the medical team involved.
In the same conversation, Semenovich touched on her current romantic life, revealing that she is in a guest relationship with her new partner. He travels regularly for work between Russia and Europe, which means he spends a lot of time apart. The singer explained that she values her independence and is comfortable with a relationship that does not require cohabitation. She described herself as a self-sufficient woman who enjoys her own company and who feels content living life on her own terms. This stance on independence appears to be a consistent thread in her personal philosophy, influencing how she approaches relationships and life decisions more broadly.
Earlier, Semenovich had spoken openly about her experience with plastic surgery, noting regrets about some of the cosmetic procedures she had undertaken in the past. The candid reflection fits into a broader narrative about learning from past choices and prioritizing authenticity. Her openness about both the positive and less favorable outcomes of cosmetic interventions resonates with many people who weigh the risks and rewards of aesthetic procedures in contemporary society. Overall, the interview provides a multifaceted portrait of Semenovich as an artist navigating public scrutiny, personal growth, and the practical realities of modern life, including fertility planning and the pursuit of emotional and financial security.